From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEFCC63697 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BF52222E for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388033AbgKPUoR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:44:17 -0500 Received: from baldur.buserror.net ([165.227.176.147]:47060 "EHLO baldur.buserror.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387974AbgKPUoO (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:44:14 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1010 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:44:13 EST Received: from [2601:449:8480:af0:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0] by baldur.buserror.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kel5G-0005re-V4; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:26:44 -0600 Message-ID: <8b23cec8b7b490ec8ef578cbd2fe4316288d4e13.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, segher@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, natechancellor@gmail.com Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:26:40 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20201116120913.165317-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> References: <20201116120913.165317-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2601:449:8480:af0:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, segher@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, natechancellor@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop -me200 addition to build flags X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on baldur.buserror.net) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 23:09 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Currently a build with CONFIG_E200=y will fail with: > > Error: invalid switch -me200 > Error: unrecognized option -me200 > > Upstream binutils has never supported an -me200 option. Presumably it > was supported at some point by either a fork or Freescale internal > binutils. > > We can't support code that we can't even build test, so drop the > addition of -me200 to the build flags, so we can at least build with > CONFIG_E200=y. > > Reported-by: Németh Márton > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman > --- > > More discussion: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202011131146.g8dPLQDD-lkp@intel.com > --- > arch/powerpc/Makefile | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) Acked-by: Scott Wood I'd go further and remove E200 code entirely, unless someone with the hardware can claim that it actually works. There doesn't appear to be any actual platform support for an e200-based system. It seems to be a long-abandoned work in progress. -Scott