mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: "Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>,
	daniel@ffwll.ch, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 00:31:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b28151c-f2db-af3f-8dff-87dd5d57417b@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a84875dde6565842aa07ddb96245b7d939cb4fd.camel@pengutronix.de>

On 2023-03-28 04:54, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Danilo,
> 
> Am Dienstag, dem 28.03.2023 um 02:57 +0200 schrieb Danilo Krummrich:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Commit df622729ddbf ("drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity") 
>> tries to track the accumulated time that a job was active on the GPU 
>> writing it to the entity through which the job was deployed to the 
>> scheduler originally. This is done within drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() 
>> which fetches a job from the schedulers pending_list.
>>
>> Doing this can result in a race condition where the entity is already 
>> freed, but the entity's newly added elapsed_ns field is still accessed 
>> once the job is fetched from the pending_list.
>>
>> After drm_sched_entity_destroy() being called it should be safe to free 
>> the structure that embeds the entity. However, a job originally handed 
>> over to the scheduler by this entity might still reside in the 
>> schedulers pending_list for cleanup after drm_sched_entity_destroy() 
>> already being called and the entity being freed. Hence, we can run into 
>> a UAF.
>>
> Sorry about that, I clearly didn't properly consider this case.
> 
>> In my case it happened that a job, as explained above, was just picked 
>> from the schedulers pending_list after the entity was freed due to the 
>> client application exiting. Meanwhile this freed up memory was already 
>> allocated for a subsequent client applications job structure again. 
>> Hence, the new jobs memory got corrupted. Luckily, I was able to 
>> reproduce the same corruption over and over again by just using 
>> deqp-runner to run a specific set of VK test cases in parallel.
>>
>> Fixing this issue doesn't seem to be very straightforward though (unless 
>> I miss something), which is why I'm writing this mail instead of sending 
>> a fix directly.
>>
>> Spontaneously, I see three options to fix it:
>>
>> 1. Rather than embedding the entity into driver specific structures 
>> (e.g. tied to file_priv) we could allocate the entity separately and 
>> reference count it, such that it's only freed up once all jobs that were 
>> deployed through this entity are fetched from the schedulers pending list.
>>
> My vote is on this or something in similar vain for the long term. I
> have some hope to be able to add a GPU scheduling algorithm with a bit
> more fairness than the current one sometime in the future, which
> requires execution time tracking on the entities.

Danilo,

Using kref is preferable, i.e. option 1 above.

Lucas, can you shed some light on,

1. In what way the current FIFO scheduling is unfair, and
2. shed some details on this "scheduling algorithm with a bit
more fairness than the current one"? 

Regards,
Luben

> 
>> 2. Somehow make sure drm_sched_entity_destroy() does block until all 
>> jobs deployed through this entity were fetched from the schedulers 
>> pending list. Though, I'm pretty sure that this is not really desirable.
>>
>> 3. Just revert the change and let drivers implement tracking of GPU 
>> active times themselves.
>>
> Given that we are already pretty late in the release cycle and etnaviv
> being the only driver so far making use of the scheduler elapsed time
> tracking I think the right short term solution is to either move the
> tracking into etnaviv or just revert the change for now. I'll have a
> look at this.
> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
>> In the case of just reverting the change I'd propose to also set a jobs 
>> entity pointer to NULL  once the job was taken from the entity, such 
>> that in case of a future issue we fail where the actual issue resides 
>> and to make it more obvious that the field shouldn't be used anymore 
>> after the job was taken from the entity.
>>
>> I'm happy to implement the solution we agree on. However, it might also 
>> make sense to revert the change until we have a solution in place. I'm 
>> also happy to send a revert with a proper description of the problem. 
>> Please let me know what you think.
>>
>> - Danilo
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28  0:57 Danilo Krummrich
2023-03-28  8:54 ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-04  4:31   ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2023-04-05 14:05     ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-04-05 16:09       ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-05 16:23         ` Danilo Krummrich
2023-04-06  8:22         ` Christian König
2023-04-06  8:27           ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06  9:05             ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-06 10:09               ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 12:21                 ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-06 13:37                   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 14:43                     ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-06 15:30                       ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 17:11                         ` Asahi Lina
2023-04-06 17:42                           ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 17:46                             ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 10:45             ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-06 12:09               ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 12:19                 ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-06 13:56                   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 14:21               ` Christian König
2023-04-06 15:24                 ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-06 15:33                   ` Christian König
2023-04-06 15:59                     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 16:23                       ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 22:36               ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-06 22:30           ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-05 17:44     ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-05 20:44       ` Luben Tuikov
2023-04-06 15:58         ` Lucas Stach
2023-04-06 22:06           ` Luben Tuikov
     [not found] <e3e07282-136f-5239-96ae-4aeb2d3c95d7.ref@yahoo.de>
     [not found] ` <e3e07282-136f-5239-96ae-4aeb2d3c95d7@yahoo.de>
2023-03-28 10:29   ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b28151c-f2db-af3f-8dff-87dd5d57417b@amd.com \
    --to=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®