From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983ABC43612 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 11:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C13E206B7 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 11:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728256AbfAHLCh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 06:02:37 -0500 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:7546 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727107AbfAHLCh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 06:02:37 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046660.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx08-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x08Au4Jn016914; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:02:01 +0100 Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx08-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ptt11xepy-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:02:01 +0100 Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (zeta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 16C1238; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 11:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag5node3.st.com [10.75.127.15]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C8E5C2A7F; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 11:01:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.48.0.167] (10.75.127.50) by SFHDAG5NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:01:57 +0100 Subject: Re: New IIO/counter driver To: Benjamin Gaignard , William Breathitt Gray CC: Patrick Havelange , Jonathan Cameron , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , Lars-Peter Clausen , Benjamin GAIGNARD , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Hartmut Knaack , Andrew Morton , Linux ARM References: <20190108004632.GA3247@icarus> From: Fabrice Gasnier Message-ID: <8b2bb569-a6e0-25ec-740d-48083b30fe60@st.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:01:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.50] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG8NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.22) To SFHDAG5NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.15) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-08_06:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/8/19 11:57 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 à 01:46, William Breathitt Gray > a écrit : >> >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Patrick Havelange wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm in the process of adding a new IIO/counter driver, however I also saw >>> that there was a work in progress to have a separate counter subsystem ( >>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=153974167727206 ). But it seems there is >>> no recent progress on it. >>> What is the state of those patches ? Is it still interesting to develop the >>> driver as an IIO/counter , or should I use already that new subsystem ? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Patrick Havelange. >> >> Hello, >> >> I am still open to merging this patchset and maintaining the Counter >> subsystem. However, I took the lack of response for my latest >> submission to indicate a loss of interest in this patchset's approach. >> If there are still people who want this, I can rebase and resend this >> patchset for submission; the past few versions have primarily been code >> clarity and documentation changes so I believe the core design itself is >> somewhat stable now. >> >> Just let me know how best to proceed and I shall be happy to oblige -- >> whether to continue maintaining this patchset or to drop this design in >> favor of improving the existing IIO Counter code in the kernel. >> >> I'll CC those from the patchset submission to keep them in the loop. > > I confirm that I still interested to get those patches merged. > > Regards, > Benjamin Hi, Same for me, Regards, Fabrice >> >> Sincerely, >> >> William Breathitt Gray >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > >