mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<Dave.Martin@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<babu.moger@amd.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] fs/resctrl: Do not allocate a monitor context when releasing limbo RMIDs
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 15:05:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b407e60-4def-4556-bf9d-2f13f970e676@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031063634.1678345-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

Hi Jinjie,

On 10/30/26 11:36 PM, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Busy RMIDs of a monitor domain are normally released by the limbo
> handler once their cache occupancy drops below the threshold. When a
> domain goes offline, its busy RMIDs are released without checking
> occupancy, since the domain is going away and the RMIDs would otherwise
> never return to the free list.
> 
> On the monitor domain offline path, __check_limbo() allocates
> the monitor context that an occupancy check needs before it scans
> the busy RMIDs, but without using it, and returns early when that
> allocation fails. Then the caller destroys the domain's monitoring state,
> including the bitmap that records which RMIDs are busy, so nothing can
> clear those bits afterwards and the busy counts never reach zero. Those
> RMIDs never return to the free list and, where the RMID depends on
> the CLOSID, the dirty count of their CLOSID never decreases. The allocation
> can also wait for a monitor to become free, which stalls the CPU offline
> path on a context that is not going to be used.
> 
> Only MPAM systems are affected. An architecture that can always read an
> RMID allocates nothing for the monitor context, so the allocation can
> neither fail nor wait there.
> 
> Move the release of busy RMIDs into a separate function that does
> not take a monitor context and leave the occupancy check to
> __check_limbo().

Same comment as v2: could you please adjust the line wraps to not jump around
as much? 

> Fixes: e557999f80a5 ("x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read()")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 7.1.x
> ---

Thank you.

With changelog line wrap change:
| Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Reinette


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-31  6:36 [PATCH v3 0/2] fs/resctrl: Fix RMID limbo handling Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-31  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] fs/resctrl: Report a temporary RMID shortage per CLOSID Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-02 23:05   ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-31  6:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] fs/resctrl: Do not allocate a monitor context when releasing limbo RMIDs Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-02 23:05   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b407e60-4def-4556-bf9d-2f13f970e676@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®