Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dmaengine_pcm: Consider DMA cache caused delay in pointer callback

[Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>]

On 10/02/2020 16.37, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:28:44PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 10/02/2020 16.21, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
>>>>  	delay += codec_delay;
>>>>  
>>>> -	runtime->delay = delay;
>>>> +	runtime->delay += delay;
> 
>>> Is it correct?
>>> delay already takes runtime->delay as its basis, so it'll result in a
>>> double.
> 
>> The delay here is coming from the DAI and the codec.
>> The runtime->delay hold the PCM (DMA) caused delay.
> 
> I think Takashi's point here (and a query I have) is that we end up with
> 
> 	delay = runtime->delay;
> 	delay += stuff;
> 	runtime->delay += delay;
> 
> which is equivalent to
> 
> 	runtime->delay = (runtime->delay * 2) + stuff;
> 
> and that's a bit surprising.

I see, I have missed what
9fb4c2bf130b ASoC: soc-pcm: Use delay set in component pointer function

did.
the soc-pcm part of the patch can be dropped then.

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki