mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adrian McMenamin" <lkmladrian@gmail.com>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: "Rene Herman" <rene.herman@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxsh-dev@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Paul Mundt" <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: time_after - what on earth???
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:10:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b67d60709111610s41e1964dsc2fe21a6eca4096@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070911230940.GA7070@atjola.homenet>

On 12/09/2007, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2007.09.12 00:19:09 +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
> > On 09/12/2007 12:15 AM, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/09/2007, Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On 09/12/2007 12:05 AM, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> OK, why does this line occasionally return true:
>
> What exactly is "occassionally"?  Does it happen more than once per
> boot? If not, and it happens after a certain time after booting, it
> might be wrapping of the jiffie counter (see below).
>
> >>>>
> >>>>       if ((maple_dev->interval > 0) && (jiffies >maple_dev->when))
> >>>>
> >>>> while this one never does (no other changes made):
> >>>>
> >>>> if  ((maple_dev->interval > 0) && (time_after(jiffies,
> >>>> maple_dev->when)))
> >>> Is maple_dev->when an unsigned long?
> >>>
> >> Yes. Does that make a difference?
> >
> > If it had been a signed type, it could've wrapped to something you didn't
> > expect, explaining the difference at least...
> >
> > With an unsigned long, the only diference should be that time_after() deals
> > with jiffie wrapping which I assume is not an actual problem here. I'll
> > retreat into the shades again... ;-(
>
> If "occasionally" is limited to once per boot, it might be jiffie
> wrapping. IIRC jiffies are initialized so that they wrap after about 5
> minutes of uptime to reveal such bugs without forcing you to wait for
> ages just to have the counter wrap for the first time.
>

No, I mean "works properly" - ie occasionally evaluates as true

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-11 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-11 22:05 Adrian McMenamin
2007-09-11 22:11 ` Rene Herman
2007-09-11 22:15   ` Adrian McMenamin
2007-09-11 22:19     ` Rene Herman
2007-09-11 23:09       ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-11 23:10         ` Adrian McMenamin [this message]
2007-09-11 23:50           ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-12  0:03             ` Adrian McMenamin
2007-09-11 23:16         ` Rene Herman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b67d60709111610s41e1964dsc2fe21a6eca4096@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lkmladrian@gmail.com \
    --cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxsh-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®