From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=115.124.30.130 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794195818; b=CgV5wd40X7D5RjxxLNVhtQioFRWdo+Vswy5DxYcGKIrfN7dWKtNmMYm1L/FDYhjWmqu7 mBqbqk9eXMibC4UsXOEmbFthjf4KdogOja5rdKdGeZv270UP7nRO3ngRinF1/HclmH4Fa SsS5eKqnQGLPHEsMXd3uPnST7OI6Ia/MzQ5Ir+yOR/vGhTVQFfLVyghRI+O7oyADz3b0Q NU7TqcM7BdLNVnie85T/M7rqt9HMZ2aZybfeUcfRKqMgUiT2bI9tz+MBi2T++qTQWlhDl bVNmDUa0L58RhsMS4J16vRYVUh6HUw/aXXjJWdCsJsD4DFGUAjRMewXy3KiLZKZSMGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794195818; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:X-Alimail-AntiSpam:Received:Message-ID: Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=VxCc9CWGeKPIK0yidoTH1LkVvQU2hINZ7DGVHD2Knc8=; b=r0n11GIs1r2qZQPzQOnh7QaL+IkMbPFxpJD1ol7GFhkGDR3I776Nry6Mx/I91EUpGF2m QcwMxNe1zMZeGwy7Bq39GpDUCzZGYT+C7bbzk2m8MxvZLPeAZUUVH+kmeiFv8xoxyfenu At20P6kHNDmcTDVSsu9BENsyYjnbwzXXhLq9BH8ebJc+CRH1tsh/AK4e6hPo8VUivxGxP 75sc/mCkPwzJaZah5xxaIcde1hIXa0yRtzY4QtOmrjSnfZUjNhl6zDkZWxVKBACYny9n3 Qoix55vLNn9h7xhhr0Nq4phkMwwfj501/MpMYrTeNmEj5gEqjV67Lh+v5zyjZQsdr9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b="pe/iC9Iq"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=115.124.30.130 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE68606A31C for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 03:43:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 2FE68606A31C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=pe/iC9Iq DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1794195808; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=VxCc9CWGeKPIK0yidoTH1LkVvQU2hINZ7DGVHD2Knc8=; b=pe/iC9Iq6TWefmdRr1xrsN7dpkHqJQHjnqaDfT9KzquC1xAoynGVBmJI5uN7kUys3upJlCEa8RmHcaRB+Wl+Anh+cFuOVsgAYuQWKN34U9ikprrLfCBvIvrFdq+GWu/hIt3TRkA4p63ipL4dZ5v1eKNEs+KNIlfM1Ob7NTd3kaY= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033045133197;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0XEIKFAw_1794195806; Received: from 30.221.146.205(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0XEIKFAw_1794195806 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 09 Nov 2026 11:43:27 +0800 Message-ID: <8b72e94b-2871-4a45-8a9b-2841dd76e4ff@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 11:43:26 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/31] ocfs2: split dinode validation into shared predicates To: Andrew Morton , Heming Zhao Cc: Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20261106111458.1467464-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> From: Joseph Qi In-Reply-To: <20261106111458.1467464-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/6/26 7:14 PM, Joseph Qi wrote: > 22 Bug fix. filecheck fix reported SUCCESS on corruption it cannot > repair. Revalidate and return the residual code, snapshotting > the block so a failed repair is rolled back rather than leaving > a dirty buffer behind. Sashiko still has review comments on this patch and I've confirmed it looks real. https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106111458.1467464-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Will address it on v3 later. Thanks, Joseph