From: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-hummingboard-t: convert overlay to board dts
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:32:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b77dc76-7c03-45e8-8b40-98e62c468310@solid-run.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVZB1iiM5K1VWch5HrohRz+HYu2z1KBXDh2e01TTPgOWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 12.11.24 um 10:21 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Hi Josua,
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 6:05 AM Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com> wrote:
>> Am 01.11.24 um 15:16 schrieb Josua Mayer:
>>> SolidRun HummingBoard-T has two options for M.2 connector, supporting
>>> either PCI-E or USB-3.1 Gen 1 - depending on configuration of a mux
>>> on the serdes lane.
>>> The required configurations in device-tree were modeled as overlays.
>>>
>>> The USB-3.1 overlay uses /delete-property/ to unset a boolean property
>>> on the usb controller limiting it to USB-2.0 by default.
>>> Overlays can not delete a property from the base dtb, therefore this
>>> overlay is at this time useless.
>>>
>>> Convert both overlays into full dts by including the base board dts.
>>> While the pcie overlay was functional, both are converted for a
>>> consistent user experience when selecting between the two mutually
>>> exclusive configurations.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAMuHMdXTgpTnJ9U7egC2XjFXXNZ5uiY1O+WxNd6LPJW5Rs5KTw@mail.gmail.com
>>> Fixes: bbef42084cc1 ("arm64: dts: ti: hummingboard-t: add overlays for m.2 pci-e and usb-3")
>>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 4 ----
>>> ...gboard-t-pcie.dtso => k3-am642-hummingboard-t-pcie.dts} | 14 ++++++++------
>>> ...gboard-t-usb3.dtso => k3-am642-hummingboard-t-usb3.dts} | 13 ++++++++-----
>>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Please hold off on this patch for the moment,
>> Thanks to some comments from Geert I wish to submit an alternative
>> solution via separate patch-set, for further discussion.
> As you state in the other patch set "I do not consider it ready for
> current merge window", it may be worthwhile to not hold off?
> It can always be reverted whenif the alternative solution is accepted.
From my side it is not a high priority to solve the usb3 function,
I am more worried for the difference in how a user(space) or bootloader will
select the correct file during boot.
Right now even though pcie and usb3 variants are overlays,
"make" generates standalone dtb for each.
Should distros expect to have a .dtb for each combination of overlays
on a particular board? E.g. imagine if there was also an overlay
reassigning ethernet port, then we have 4 combinations.
Alternatively expectation can be that the bootloader collects overlays,
and applies them as needed before boot on top of a base dtb.
This is relevant e.g. as Debian uses the "model" property
to identify the correct dtb file and copy it to /boot.
I added "model" fields in this patch-set to allow differentiation.
But once the boolean issue will be fixed, and the change reverted,
A distro may have already chosen the usb3 or pcie variants as base dtb
I would prefer to hold off on this patch-set until other options have been
explored fully.
.
sincerely
Josua Mayer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 13:16 Josua Mayer
2024-11-12 5:05 ` Josua Mayer
2024-11-12 8:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-13 8:32 ` Josua Mayer [this message]
2025-01-01 12:26 ` Josua Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b77dc76-7c03-45e8-8b40-98e62c468310@solid-run.com \
--to=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®