From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
To: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>, <wg@grandegger.com>,
<mkl@pengutronix.de>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] M_CAN Framework rework
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:39:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b793f8a-6ffb-9e23-1965-9e7c631031a1@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8247a28f-ae33-1ab1-b6d1-c89b839d357c@ti.com>
On 10/24/2018 02:33 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Thursday 18 October 2018 01:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Bump
>>
>> On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> All
>>>
>>> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register
>>> to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that
>>> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions.
>>>
>>> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x
>>> device
>>> Reference upstream post:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/
>>>
>>> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to
>>> determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well
>>> as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must
>>> be set by the device attached to the core.
>>>
>>> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for
>>> writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this.
>>>
>>> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts
>>> nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will
>>> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series.
>>>
>>> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch
>>> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> Dan Murphy (3):
>>> can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code
>>> dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver
>>> can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel
>>>
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 +
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 +
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +-
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +----------------
>>> .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++--
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 +
>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++
>>> 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
>>> copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>>>
>
> Patch 1/3 never arrived for me. Its not there on lkml either.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/10/611
>
LKML seems to have issue with 1/3. Here they were posted.
Maybe the patch is to large but I received all 3 + the cover letter.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998019/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998017/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998020/
> Can you resend the complete series?
>
> Thanks,
> Faiz
>
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-10 14:20 Dan Murphy
2018-10-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code Dan Murphy
2018-10-27 14:19 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2018-10-31 20:15 ` Dan Murphy
2018-11-03 10:45 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2018-11-09 15:14 ` Dan Murphy
2019-01-09 20:58 ` Dan Murphy
2019-01-10 7:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2019-01-10 7:57 ` Rizvi, Mohammad Faiz Abbas
2019-01-10 12:54 ` Dan Murphy
2019-01-10 12:53 ` Dan Murphy
2019-01-11 8:27 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2019-01-11 12:27 ` Dan Murphy
2018-10-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver Dan Murphy
2018-10-10 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel Dan Murphy
2018-10-17 20:21 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] M_CAN Framework rework Dan Murphy
2018-10-24 7:33 ` Faiz Abbas
2018-10-24 11:39 ` Dan Murphy [this message]
2018-10-24 7:43 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2018-10-24 11:36 ` Dan Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b793f8a-6ffb-9e23-1965-9e7c631031a1@ti.com \
--to=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®