From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, robh@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: bt1: Use common dw_pcie_ltssm enum for LTSSM states
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:22:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bc47270-6d08-ae71-ac8b-c9d17044ff9c@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260315154015.126074-1-18255117159@163.com>
Hi Hans,
在 2026/03/15 星期日 23:40, Hans Zhang 写道:
> Use the generic dw_pcie_ltssm enum from pcie-designware.h instead of
> defining private LTSSM state macros. This eliminates duplication and
> aligns the driver with common DesignWare core d
No, this driver's removed due to the sanction policy in this community..
efinitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c | 38 +--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c
> index 1340edc18d12..429fab073bba 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-bt1.c
> @@ -41,42 +41,6 @@
>
> #define BT1_CCU_PCIE_PMSC 0x148
> #define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_STATE_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DET_QUIET 0x00
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DET_ACT 0x01
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_POLL_ACT 0x02
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_POLL_COMP 0x03
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_POLL_CONF 0x04
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_PRE_DET_QUIET 0x05
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DET_WAIT 0x06
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNKWD_START 0x07
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNKWD_ACEPT 0x08
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNNUM_WAIT 0x09
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_LNNUM_ACEPT 0x0a
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_COMPLETE 0x0b
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_CFG_IDLE 0x0c
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_LOCK 0x0d
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_SPEED 0x0e
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_RCVRCFG 0x0f
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_IDLE 0x10
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L0 0x11
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L0S 0x12
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L123_SEND_IDLE 0x13
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L1_IDLE 0x14
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE 0x15
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_WAKE 0x16
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DIS_ENTRY 0x17
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DIS_IDLE 0x18
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_DISABLE 0x19
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_ENTRY 0x1a
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_ACTIVE 0x1b
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_EXIT 0x1c
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LPBK_EXIT_TOUT 0x1d
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_HOT_RST_ENTRY 0x1e
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_HOT_RST 0x1f
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ0 0x20
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ1 0x21
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ2 0x22
> -#define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_RCVR_EQ3 0x23
> #define BT1_CCU_PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(6)
> #define BT1_CCU_PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(7)
> #define BT1_CCU_PCIE_PM_LINKSTATE_L0S BIT(8)
> @@ -108,7 +72,7 @@
> #define BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_LINKUP(_pmsc) \
> ({ \
> int __state = FIELD_GET(BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_STATE_MASK, _pmsc); \
> - __state >= BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L0 && __state <= BT1_CCU_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_WAKE; \
> + __state >= DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L0 && __state <= DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_WAKE; \
> })
>
> /* Baikal-T1 PCIe specific control registers */
>
> base-commit: 1c9982b4961334c1edb0745a04cabd34bc2de675
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 15:40 Hans Zhang
2026-03-17 6:22 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2026-03-17 15:39 ` Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bc47270-6d08-ae71-ac8b-c9d17044ff9c@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®