From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933978AbXC0FRK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933994AbXC0FRK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:10 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]:18883 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933978AbXC0FRH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gjw3N3wBUhsX7nXKwY+akQ3H7kxSVe9snOlGB3wcxqUOV6nC7Haghts/xXvKVUjv5fNXpuJe3M5MqN8BdB+Yxc1KxwWqVEEalZYHKyMWqPJ1JsdPxlWa0WWX7t3CdmQstu1xJsPjivERWjsbJdUbMihneVxqtVfXbm5uCpyv8LY= Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0703262217g16aa62d4g1221082deda0aed2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 From: "Mike Frysinger" To: "Paul Mundt" , "Mike Frysinger" , "Wu, Bryan" , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Blackfin arch: add kdebug header file In-Reply-To: <20070327044914.GA26099@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1174903941.32691.72.camel@roc-desktop> <200703262345.09489.arnd@arndb.de> <1174966837.6966.13.camel@roc-desktop> <20070327035734.GA25883@linux-sh.org> <8bd0f97a0703262134h20bdf8dcqb1043ca176a7149c@mail.gmail.com> <20070327044914.GA26099@linux-sh.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt wrote: > > >You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the > > >future > > > > we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt doable for us > > If you think mangling patches by hand is a more effective use of time, no > one is stopping you -- some people even prefer that. On the other hand, if > you're struggling with an effective methodology before things are merged, > what reason is there to suspect that things will get better afterwards? we have a lot of infrastructure that the SCM is part of and at the moment, git is not a supported SCM i'm not saying the current system is easy, just that we cant integrate git in the short term, so we'll continue spanking Bryan with the overhead :/ -mike