From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965291AbXC0HUf (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:20:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965301AbXC0HUf (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:20:35 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]:42563 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965291AbXC0HUe (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:20:34 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L8L9JPuYCalbuZqXC9S80Fry8X/dP9UZf4SZWrqoluwrZGfUqULB7eTsQFSJR1+hPcrDr9OMShbWrYBmpjEtMV2t4Lr9yDVjMOdfisG4xOs4tbtzPkEV0EOBT4PNH5uA36OduaknivnReZImjQCYU29dZU8NpxAN2/MSuN3fLnQ= Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0703270020m67821b90gb9d1cdfd6262887b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:20:33 -0400 From: "Mike Frysinger" To: "Pekka J Enberg" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Revoke core code: fix nommu arch compiling error bug Cc: "Wu, Bryan" , "David Howells" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Hugh Dickins" , "Alan Cox" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1174904637.32691.86.camel@roc-desktop> <6017.1174908318@redhat.com> <6791.1174909459@redhat.com> <11045.1174911764@redhat.com> <22674.1174915478@redhat.com> <8bd0f97a0703261321h356a849am1ab617f0e732fa67@mail.gmail.com> <1174966174.6966.5.camel@roc-desktop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/27/07, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Wu, Bryan wrote: > > Agree. MPU of Blackfin can provide some processes protection. But maybe > > at this moment just disable revoke for NOMMU is easier for further > > development. When we provide the MPU stuff, maybe we can enable the > > revoke for NOMMU but MPU arch. > > Yeah, MPU should be sufficient for revoke(). Note that mmap() and mummap() > suffers from the same problem on NOMMU so perhaps we really should do > CONFIG_MPU. we would need both ... MPU gives us the ability to restrict access, but we'd still be unable to do fun things like COW -mike