From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
To: "Kyle McMartin" <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Cc: "Joshua Wise" <jwise@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@google.com,
thockin@google.com, mikew@google.com, masouds@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Info dump on Oops or panic()
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:54:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0706281654r37a3e10cja74a359bf7d425f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070628221835.GI2784@fattire.cabal.ca>
On 6/28/07, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:05:56PM -0700, Joshua Wise wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > printk("CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());
> > __show_regs(regs);
> > show_trace(NULL, regs, (void *)(regs + 1));
> > + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&info_dumper_list, 0, NULL);
> > }
> >
>
> woah woah woah. This could push critical bits of the register dump or
> stacktrace off the screen... Barring any other problems with the patch,
> this should probably be dumped in the oops header, not trailing it where
> it could hide critical debugging info.
on the flip side, poorly written chained funcs could oops thus
preventing the good info (like stacktrace) from being shown ...
-mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-28 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-28 22:05 Joshua Wise
2007-06-28 22:18 ` Kyle McMartin
2007-06-28 23:12 ` [PATCH] [revised -- version 2] " Joshua Wise
2007-06-28 23:48 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-29 2:15 ` Joshua Wise
2007-06-28 23:54 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2007-06-29 0:39 ` [PATCH] " Jiri Kosina
2007-06-29 2:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-29 1:15 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bd0f97a0706281654r37a3e10cja74a359bf7d425f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@google.com \
--cc=jwise@google.com \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masouds@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=thockin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®