Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS

["Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@seznam.cz> wrote:
>  I would like to fix syscalls in Microblaze repo. Can you give me a hint how to
>  do it?
>
>  I look at Blackfin arch and I compared files with microblaze. There are some
>  differences but not so much.
>  Can you tell me how to test it which syscall is necessary for platform.
>  I have never found any documentation about.
>
>  In my syscall_table.S (on some arch in entry.S) is one big jump table with
>  reference to syscalls. In unistd.h is definition.
>
>  Is there any convention which syscalls are use for all archs and which are
>  architecture specific?

i dont believe there is any documentation for syscalls.  you just have
to know which syscalls are outdated and which replace others ;).  i
think someone already pointed out a few to you in an earlier post ?
otherwise, feel free to ask about sets.

i dont recall if microblaze is no-mmu-only, mmu-only, or both ... you
should take care with comparing against Blackfin if microblaze
supports an mmu.  if it is no-mmu-only, then the Blackfin list should
be quite good for you start with as we turn off numa/mmu-only
functions as well as old stuff (like the poll/select/mmap/etc...
friends).
-mike