From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764071AbYETXVS (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 19:21:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755379AbYETXVF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 19:21:05 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:26185 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754323AbYETXVD (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 19:21:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R3ROPzZ0URHSvoAWvrCHXViiBe0xl5yhXZ8SQ4Kw5tcS+reEqZd13n2qYP6S+NN3a1Z9duzNfaxVT7sWCUd9hal/8exlchqs47vCFkW820r5fQpotJGcRI4TuLOuSf7SF1PuDl+iJ8o/f+W1AuYHthvg+p3sVhsRFyhsH6uAuKw= Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0805201621j449ad2a5s7c24e1a48c3aa31c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 19:21:03 -0400 From: "Mike Frysinger" To: "Russell King" Subject: Re: b4aa54d951d38d7a989d6b6385494ef5ea7371d7 breaks some serial configurations Cc: "Javier Herrero" , "Linux Kernel List" , "Alan Cox" , "Bryan Wu" In-Reply-To: <20080520231323.GA10750@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080520073556.GA1090@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <483286AF.2090302@hvsistemas.es> <20080520083217.GA10172@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4832AD84.6090300@hvsistemas.es> <20080520231323.GA10750@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Javier Herrero wrote: >> I see... would be OK to move the asm/serial.h include to its original >> position and to modify the asm-blackfin/serial.h in this way to avoid >> duplicate definition warnings, or would it be too ugly?: > > Can blackfin systems accept PCMCIA cards? Or PCI cards? In which case > you probably don't want to implement this support like this. yes, you can hook PCMCIA cards up to a Blackfin proc (and we have). we probably wont be supporting PCI since it tends to require MMU support, and at least with all the Blackfins we support now, none have PCI support on-chip. -mike