From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754936AbZEZK2U (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 06:28:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750852AbZEZK2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 06:28:13 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:35908 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbZEZK2M convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 06:28:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KqyjjosgYChs5P6MCWlFq57gG027RtkMeQGPiG6uwientYZq3U04gQyJchEgpJRpCA AoNQYWdRS6rh3U7EvAyJDTRZs4gLu+c4Rn1FVGDmvXRSvue+P10227zffWK7NI+vBdK5 KPhF+VwavIhDnPNI0e/TKEht1QX6q+isV3vjk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090526102502.GA24737@infradead.org> References: <1243332633-15258-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20090526102502.GA24737@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 06:28:14 -0400 Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0905260328ndaa5b64x212eda09d2e20d15@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/rtc: disable legacy RTC driver on Blackfin systems From: Mike Frysinger To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Cc: Mike Frysinger , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:10:33AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>       tristate "Enhanced Real Time Clock Support (legacy PC RTC driver)" >>       depends on !PPC && !PARISC && !IA64 && !M68K && !SPARC && !FRV \ >> -                     && !ARM && !SUPERH && !S390 && !AVR32 >> +                     && !ARM && !SUPERH && !S390 && !AVR32 && !BLACKFIN > > Maybe it's better to have a positive dependency for those that actually > support it these days?  Based on the above list that would be: > >        depends on ALPHA || CRIS || H8300 || M32R || MICROBLAZE || >                   MIPS || MN10300 || SH || X86 || XTENSA > > and I would not be surprised if some of the above don't actually support > it either.. it was my understanding that this driver was destined to be dropped down the line ... easier to extend the cruft for now than try to ping arch maintainers for confirmation ... -mike