From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751958AbdJYRCv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:02:51 -0400
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com ([173.37.86.73]:17526 "EHLO
        rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751705AbdJYRCu (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:02:50 -0400
X-Greylist: delayed 554 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:02:49 EDT
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,432,1503360000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="315223311"
Subject: Re: Detecting page cache trashing state
To: "Ruslan Ruslichenko -X (rruslich - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco)" 
        <rruslich@cisco.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@cisco.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        xe-linux-external@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <150543458765.3781.10192373650821598320@takondra-t460s>
 <20170915143619.2ifgex2jxck2xt5u@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <150549651001.4512.15084374619358055097@takondra-t460s>
 <20170918163434.GA11236@cmpxchg.org>
 <acbf4417-4ded-fa03-7b8d-34dc0803027c@cisco.com>
From: Daniel Walker <danielwa@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <8be3f051-0858-c014-96a7-a1903f063980@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:53:35 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <acbf4417-4ded-fa03-7b8d-34dc0803027c@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 09/28/2017 08:49 AM, Ruslan Ruslichenko -X (rruslich - GLOBALLOGIC 
INC at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Hopefully I was able to rebase the patch on top v4.9.26 (latest 
> supported version by us right now)
> and test a bit.
> The overall idea definitely looks promising, although I have one 
> question on usage.
> Will it be able to account the time which processes spend on handling 
> major page faults
> (including fs and iowait time) of refaulting page?

Johannes, did you get a chance to review the changes from Ruslan ?

Daniel