From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754281Ab1KUPrK (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:47:10 -0500 Received: from mail.sf-mail.de ([62.27.20.61]:38778 "EHLO mail.sf-mail.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752242Ab1KUPrI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:47:08 -0500 Message-ID: <8be4650484e8827410219db85531ecaf.squirrel@webmail.sf-mail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20111118222718.GF22904@local> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:47:06 +0100 Subject: Re: extra large DMA buffer for PCI-E device under UIO From: "Rolf Eike Beer" To: "Jean-Francois Dagenais" Cc: "Hans J. Koch" , gregkh@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "open list" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The pci ID we use is not registered, and except for this driver, which > is a non-driver really (UIO), the FPGA firmware and the userspace code is > proprietary. Why keep people doing this? This is just asking for future trouble. And it gives bad karma. Go and ask your FPGA vendor to assign a device id to you. At least for Xilinx this has worked. Eike