From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DA9C169C4 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC322177E for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redchan.it header.i=@redchan.it header.b="rqtTv07F" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728016AbfA2JKq (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:10:46 -0500 Received: from cock.li ([185.100.85.212]:43996 "EHLO cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725846AbfA2JKq (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:10:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=redchan.it; s=mail; t=1548753041; bh=yZmDgvkHbyEClAbkWnWXPyK/jH1XgNVK2Ky5VL0tzAI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rqtTv07FYDPBE7Y/GysSMjq6UUUiJRvonrEdypVsOhBKpg5127N09za+Gykogh6S7 Aek41o6/k9QVvGobDGkE8q8vZPt6E42At7XyNl6TsDqZDcakGpvZb1mdbSlfof3XBo zE7M9Nm2kKij461qqqgz/56WBsKX1FHN01rwxKmq/9opx8vc9+/l/h+mBb39el6h9Z IkSDn8k1xr+aQr/ZnY4spzVd4T9JjMM8JpXlNYLD+IvsYIvAfIvNGUX4SO03Nh9K4Y Y9ia9t77Oc1Vga/XFRAOrL6ju618g46/7v6k4xpV/Penyt6QHks0BP8pwpcImaixAJ Kt4zQJ+gyrivA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:10:41 +0000 From: linuxgpletc@redchan.it To: editor@lulz.com, editor@lwn.net, news@theregister.co.uk Cc: misc@openbsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Author of GPC-Slots2 promises to sue "John Doe" who violated GPL recission. (update) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8c67b91bfc1d70626f4e753e1d11857f@redchan.it> X-Sender: linuxgpletc@redchan.it User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Some updates (2): http://8ch.net/tech/res/1018729.html#1024398 Anonymous 01/29/19 (Tue) 08:47:02 No.1024601 >> 1024597 > HOW MUCH DID YOU FUCKING PAY ME? Nothing. Thank God for that. > ARE WE IN A CONTRACT? No. > IT IS A BARE LICENSE. Is this lawyer speak? I'm not a lawyer, sorry. > I CAN RESCIND IT AT ANY TIME. wrong > THE CODE IS NOT YOUR PROPERTY. IT IS _MY_ PROPERTY. It is your intellectual property that you have licensed to me under the GPLv2+. > I ALLOWED YOU A LICENSE TO USE IT. correct > I HAVE NOW REVOKED THAT LICENSE FROM YOU YOU [...]. no > Show me a case otherwise. why??????????? > Gratis licenses, without an attached interest, are revocable. sorry m8. you are wrong Anonymous 01/29/19 (Tue) 09:03:54 No.1024602 >> 1024601 > >ARE WE IN A CONTRACT? > No. Then explain to me, if we are not in a contract, how you can bind me to a "no revocation" clause. Explain it to me, slowly, please. > >IT IS A BARE LICENSE. > Is this lawyer speak? I'm not a lawyer, sorry. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. A bare license is simply permission. When you allow someone to enter your house you are giving them a (bare) license to enter your house. When you tell them to leave you are rescinding that license. You can do so at any time. Now if they pay you for "I can enter your house for 30 days", then because there is consideration, and a contract, you cannot then reneg on that term. > >I CAN RESCIND IT AT ANY TIME. > wrong You just agreed that we are not in a contract, how can you now declare that I cannot rescind the license. Please explain you reasoning > sorry m8. you are wrong Give you legal reasoning.