From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing2021.csail.mit.edu (outgoing2021.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166761B85FF for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=128.30.2.78 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727146591; cv=none; b=BSk/KxhE74xzuh8EV/JjdUXpvHeKyix/uQeptnXu0tJw1Ip57KnlYS5CKJPB/j//7c9hD699ACLzj8Or74uub3xGbk3ttYZapufH8xl+1wb5hRsUSW7qTs22VyVByiYtzjjfzundpVh0614ias0VpGfDsVkIxyIjrw+gtm67+tA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727146591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3r9orr/TrGhIkbJIar7PT7lPiK/7NZX5wnJT5ck+f0s=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JeMt3QuV5/H+FDhW8n4uBB72Ckyo9VGaQXehyZk2tm5Ea0x8ZLWywsJsf8LZiEWyeL3mSwvabMF4bm9D/048OyvLZXNvL3xjSB5sXrijR5XEwrLkshaAmEo+SadvMbSqzpxk33aKZWElQC7MSku808xRdfaKlPVDcPtWBYbQRRA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=csail.mit.edu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csail.mit.edu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outgoing.csail.mit.edu header.i=@outgoing.csail.mit.edu header.b=UQrCDYTV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=128.30.2.78 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=csail.mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csail.mit.edu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outgoing.csail.mit.edu header.i=@outgoing.csail.mit.edu header.b="UQrCDYTV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outgoing.csail.mit.edu; s=test20231205; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PNlnOtKzcBaTIBUSLwkMlSQRovYatJq4wqgn4uBydq8=; t=1727146589; x=1728010589; b=UQrCDYTVb6wvflmJzFrdHxKc3Tzv8OceHhkmlrIYvGCJgpx5TuKWeVOruK1NciS4/7OSTfbWMhB nZZlzVjboc5gMbInRr53GbtqrC7RL4jOeUrImWJEhHTwn9zKoL0VxQ2NjRoF7BUS74ARCvvg6kK1d 5fb0NYHv63DwVqdVYXWl9iEXqhChL2naXcHx5KrrdOljr68lBzNP7+GDqApJCCFvVjGuobwrNIGwg FAgLinbyivV4dPnVE5H47AgmEHCCBAVDO+4gtLEIK+IIr8e8Bo63xvbWxmcI5/P4fIGooWoXA/J8D JJ00y8Rb/lr+7Rg9GaO8OAQA9WHeVlGp82ww==; Received: from [49.207.232.169] (helo=[192.168.0.101]) by outgoing2021.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ssvit-00EpJN-C9; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:56:19 -0400 Message-ID: <8ca7bf74-c6c7-405f-baff-adebd8957620@csail.mit.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:26:12 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmstat: Defer the refresh_zone_stat_thresholds after all CPUs bringup Content-Language: en-GB To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" Cc: Andrew Morton , Saurabh Singh Sengar , Saurabh Sengar , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "wei.liu@kernel.org" , "mgorman@techsingularity.net" References: <1723443220-20623-1-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com> <20240920011618.bb2d2a247ae59810aee6c39c@linux-foundation.org> <529015dc-403c-7cc0-5b66-95739e1c78d2@gentwo.org> From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" In-Reply-To: <529015dc-403c-7cc0-5b66-95739e1c78d2@gentwo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 24-09-2024 01:47, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > >> @Christoph, would you mind giving your Ack if this patch v2 looks good >> to you, or kindly point out if there are any lingering concerns? > > V2 looks good to me (unitialized pcp values result in slow operation but > no negative other effects) and the late_initcall() is always executed. > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Thanks a lot Christoph! Andrew, could you please consider picking up the patch for the next release, now that all the review comments have been addressed? Thank you very much! Also, I'd like to add to this patch v2: Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (Microsoft) Regards, Srivatsa