From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Kaixuan Li <kaixuanli0131@gmail.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: bound the SIT/NAT bitmaps by the checkpoint pack
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 20:25:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cbb8aee-189f-4c69-927c-7deb1a50ab8f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919130925.1899994-1-kaixuanli0131@gmail.com>
On 9/19/26 21:09, Kaixuan Li wrote:
> sit_ver_bitmap_bytesize and nat_ver_bitmap_bytesize are used as memcpy
> lengths into and out of sbi->ckpt, which is sized from cp_payload alone,
> and nothing compares either length against that allocation.
>
> sanity_check_ckpt() has checked these two fields since c77ec61ca0a4, which
> added them after a crafted image overran build_sit_info(). That check ties
> each length to a segment count; it never compares either against the
> allocation, which is the half this adds.
>
> Mounting over-reads in build_sit_info() and build_node_manager(), and the
> first checkpoint writes the same lengths back through the same pointers,
> so the over-read's contents reach the on-disk checkpoint. An unmount is
> enough; the filesystem does not have to be used.
>
> Bound both ends the way __bitmap_ptr() lays them out. The three branches
> differ, so a single sum of the two lengths would still admit a small
> overflow when cp_payload is non-zero.
>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: c77ec61ca0a4 ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check with {sit,nat}_ver_bitmap_bytesize")
The overflow issue exists before this commit?
Thanks,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 13:09 Kaixuan Li
2026-10-11 12:25 ` Chao Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cbb8aee-189f-4c69-927c-7deb1a50ab8f@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kaixuanli0131@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®