From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mlimonci@amd.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
ajayg@nvidia.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Evan.Quan@amd.com, Lijo.Lazar@amd.com, Sanket.Goswami@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: Use the scope of power supplies to tell if power is system supplied
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 15:44:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cd8d02f-f4b2-3ad3-a3e5-f9857d8519e2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230516204114.vv5w2vmcyulmhmm4@mercury.elektranox.org>
On 5/16/2023 3:41 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:25:40PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> The logic used for power_supply_is_system_supplied() counts all power
>> supplies and:
>> * If no power supplies found assumes AC
>> * If non-battery power supplies found uses online to determine AC/DC.
>> - If any are onlined, assumes AC
>> - Othewise DC.
>>
>> This logic makes sense for desktop systems that don't export an ACPI
>> battery, but it fails once you include a dGPU that provides a UCSI
>> power supply on a desktop system without any other power supplies.
>>
>> The dGPU by default doesn't have anything plugged in so it's 'offline'.
>> This makes power_supply_is_system_supplied() return 0 with a count of
>> 1 meaning all drivers that use this get a wrong judgement.
>>
>> To fix this case adjust the logic to also examine the scope of the
>> power supply. If the power supply is deemed a device power supply,
>> then don't count it.
>>
>> Cc: Evan Quan <Evan.Quan@amd.com>
>> Suggested-by: Lijo Lazar <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
> Good find; the current logic should also break with a desktop PC
> once a POWER_SUPPLY_SCOPE_DEVICE battery device is attached (e.g.
> a HID device), because it increases the counter.
Yup!
> I suppose I can just apply this to my fixes branch since there is
> no compile time dependency to the second patch?
Yes, that's correct. I don't see a problem with the other patch going
through
another tree.
> -- Sebastian
>
>> drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
>> index ab986dbace16..d57f420ba8c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_core.c
>> @@ -348,6 +348,10 @@ static int __power_supply_is_system_supplied(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> struct power_supply *psy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> unsigned int *count = data;
>>
>> + if (!psy->desc->get_property(psy, POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE, &ret))
>> + if (ret.intval == POWER_SUPPLY_SCOPE_DEVICE)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> (*count)++;
>> if (psy->desc->type != POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY)
>> if (!psy->desc->get_property(psy, POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE,
>> @@ -366,8 +370,8 @@ int power_supply_is_system_supplied(void)
>> __power_supply_is_system_supplied);
>>
>> /*
>> - * If no power class device was found at all, most probably we are
>> - * running on a desktop system, so assume we are on mains power.
>> + * If no system scope power class device was found at all, most probably we
>> + * are running on a desktop system, so assume we are on mains power.
>> */
>> if (count == 0)
>> return 1;
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-16 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-16 18:25 [PATCH 0/2] Adjust logic for power_supply_is_system_supplied() Mario Limonciello
2023-05-16 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: Use the scope of power supplies to tell if power is system supplied Mario Limonciello
2023-05-16 20:41 ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-05-16 20:44 ` Limonciello, Mario [this message]
2023-05-16 21:54 ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-05-16 18:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Don't create power supplies for dGPUs Mario Limonciello
2023-05-17 17:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-17 18:58 ` Greg KH
2023-05-17 19:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-05-18 15:31 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-05-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] Adjust logic for power_supply_is_system_supplied() Quan, Evan
2023-05-17 17:15 ` andriy.shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cd8d02f-f4b2-3ad3-a3e5-f9857d8519e2@amd.com \
--to=mlimonci@amd.com \
--cc=Evan.Quan@amd.com \
--cc=Lijo.Lazar@amd.com \
--cc=Sanket.Goswami@amd.com \
--cc=ajayg@nvidia.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®