From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Shubhang Kaushik <sh@gentwo.org>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
rafael@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Resolve CPPC frequencies to performance levels
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 15:06:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cdd2938-a7a2-4d20-bacd-7ab4f5cbe80f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929102957.2591657-1-christian.loehle@arm.com>
On 9/29/26 05:29, Christian Loehle wrote:
> For table-based cpufreq drivers, the core resolves requests to supported
> frequency-table entries before governors such as schedutil compare them
> with their cached target. Different kHz requests selecting the same entry
> therefore need not reach the driver again.
>
> Table-less cppc-cpufreq lacks this resolution: the core returns the requested
> kHz value even if firmware exposes only a few CPPC performance levels.
> Different requests can miss the governor's cache yet program the same
> Desired Performance value. The tested ARM AGI CPU exposes only 61 levels,
> with bounds visible at:
>
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/acpi_cppc/{lowest,highest}_perf
>
> Add ->resolve_freq() so table-less ->target() drivers can canonicalize
> requests without constructing a frequency table. CPPC resolves requests
> before sugov_update_next_freq(), allowing its existing cache to skip
> equivalent requests. Raw limit notifications still trigger
> reconsideration, but only changed resolved limits force a driver update.
> Failed limit writes remain pending for retry.
>
> Testing on an ARM AGI CPU (61 distinct CPPC levels) with schedutil gives
> the following end-to-end results across 16 iterations:
>
> schbench -m 2 -t 31 -F 256 -n 5 -R 18000 -r 60 -w 20 -i 60
>
> metric baseline resolve-freq change
> median p99 3364 us 3280 us -2.5%
> mean of run p99s 3664.2 us 3299.0 us -10.0%
> worst run p99 4360 us 3500 us -19.7%
> median throughput 16431.08 RPS 16460.69 RPS +0.2%
>
> In an instrumented run of the same workload, cppc_set_perf() calls fell
> from 1,136,868 to 866,703, a 23.8% reduction.
>
> Christian Loehle (3):
> cpufreq: Add a driver frequency resolution callback
> cpufreq: CPPC: Resolve frequencies to performance levels
> cpufreq: Skip updates for unchanged resolved limits
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.rst | 4 +
> Documentation/cpu-freq/cpu-drivers.rst | 19 ++
> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 99 +++++++--
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 11 +
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 19 +-
> 6 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 6375e61c01e93e35ee7acd336a689ac1fae4b509
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 10:29 Christian Loehle
2026-09-29 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Add a driver frequency resolution callback Christian Loehle
2026-09-29 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Resolve frequencies to performance levels Christian Loehle
2026-09-29 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Skip updates for unchanged resolved limits Christian Loehle
2026-09-30 20:06 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cdd2938-a7a2-4d20-bacd-7ab4f5cbe80f@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sh@gentwo.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®