From: "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: markgross@kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
David Box <david.e.box@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake support to pmc core driver
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:32:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d1dec22-72e2-8297-9dbd-6b2904349fda@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e14b3264-7e60-9cfe-34f8-f79815878d50@redhat.com>
On 9/1/2022 8:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
>>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core
>>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs.
>>>
>>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com>
>> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
>> branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
> In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’?
> 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’
> 46 | .model = _model, \
> | ^~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’
> 129 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’
> 161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’
> 1918 | X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map),
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1
>
> And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new
> INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros.
>
> Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree:
>
> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Hi Hans!
Thank you for your Acked-by! The cpuid patch has been merged in to
v6.0-rc3. I am not sure why its complaining about
INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S being undeclared.
patch - ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 : "x86/cpu: Add new
Raptor Lake CPU model number".
I made sure its built without errors before sending it out.
>
>
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>> index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>> @@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = {
>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map),
>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map),
>>> X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map),
>>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map),
>>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map),
>>> {}
>>> };
>>>
>>>
>>> base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-30 18:20 Gayatri Kammela
2022-08-30 23:09 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2022-08-31 22:20 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2022-09-01 15:43 ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-01 15:47 ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-01 17:32 ` Kammela, Gayatri [this message]
2022-09-02 8:55 ` Hans de Goede
2022-09-12 23:35 ` Kammela, Gayatri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d1dec22-72e2-8297-9dbd-6b2904349fda@linux.intel.com \
--to=gayatri.kammela@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®