mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de, riel@surriel.com,
	liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org,
	jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:06:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d2f756a-12a2-43bb-8849-3e71c1ce5d8f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amMtRejoVMX2IV2V@lucifer>



On 24/07/26 2:50 pm, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 05:00:44AM +0000, Dev Jain wrote:
>> try_to_unmap() receives hugetlb folios only from the hwpoison path.
>> hugetlb_update_hwpoison() sets the hugetlb folio's head-page
>> hwpoison bit, and page_vma_mapped_walk() reports the hugetlb mapping at
>> the head PFN, so the previous PageHWPoison(subpage) check happened to
>> work for hugetlb.
>>
>> For non-hugetlb folios, unmap_poisoned_folio() currently rejects large
>> folios before calling try_to_unmap(). Hence it is always the case that
>> if try_to_unmap_one() handles an hwpoisoned folio, then the head page is
>> marked with the poison bit.
>>
>> Therefore, convert the poisoned subpage checks to folio_test_hwpoison().
>>
>> No functional change intended, except that, while at it,
>> convert VM_BUG_* to VM_WARN_*.
>>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> 
> Oops reviewed v2 by mistake. This LGTM so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> 

Thanks for your review.


>> ---
>>  mm/rmap.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>> index 26166a6b8cb9b..2b74668f356d6 100644
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>> @@ -2122,10 +2122,11 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  			bool anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>>
>>  			/*
>> -			 * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb page
>> -			 * in the case where the hugetlb page is poisoned.
>> +			 * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb folio
>> +			 * in the case where the hugetlb folio contains a
>> +			 * poisoned page.
>>  			 */
>> -			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHWPoison(subpage), subpage);
>> +			VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hwpoison(folio), folio);
> 
> Thanks for converting this also!
> 
>>  			/*
>>  			 * huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
>>  			 * There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
>> @@ -2204,7 +2205,11 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  		/* Update high watermark before we lower rss */
>>  		update_hiwater_rss(mm);
>>
>> -		if (PageHWPoison(subpage) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * With TTU_HWPOISON, we only expect small folios or hugetlb
>> +		 * folios here for now.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (folio_test_hwpoison(folio) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
> 
> As per v2 discussion, I feel this could be tightened up, maybe something like:
> 
> 		/* unmap_poisoned_folio() only refs order-0 or hugetlb folios */
> 

I can do this. But note that this series is in mm-unstable already - what should
I base the v4 on?

>>  			pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
>>  			if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
>>  				hugetlb_count_sub(folio_nr_pages(folio), mm);
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
> 
> Cheers, Lorenzo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-25  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13  5:00 [PATCH v3 0/5] mm/rmap: Refactor try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-07-13  5:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks Dev Jain
2026-07-24  9:20   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-25  7:36     ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-07-26  2:07       ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-26  8:22         ` Dev Jain
2026-07-13  5:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one Dev Jain
2026-07-24 10:39   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-25  8:47     ` Dev Jain
2026-07-13  5:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-07-13  5:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mm/rmap: refactor anon folio unmap in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-07-28 19:27   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-13  5:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm/rmap: add anon folio unmap dispatcher Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d2f756a-12a2-43bb-8849-3e71c1ce5d8f@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®