mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
	Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Drivers: hv: Avoid infinite retry loop in init_vp_index()
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:39:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d38f7c0-f15d-4568-bc2f-559179ccb45c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB4157019C1A3D1233CAFAC2D0D4AA2@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

On 8/30/26 7:17 PM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2026 6:22 PM
>> On 8/27/26 5:10 PM, Michael Kelley wrote:
>>> From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2026 12:38 PM
>>>> There is a retry loop in init_vp_index() where the CPUs from a certain
>>>> node are stripped out if they have already been in the allocated cpumask
>>>> or not in HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ housekeeping cpumask. If there is no
>>>> CPU left, the allocated cpumask is ignored and the process is retried
>>>> again. However, if the HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ housekeeping cpumask turns
>>>> out not to contain any CPU in that particular node, that will become an
>>>> infinite retry loop.  This particular problem was reported by sashiko
>>>> [1]. This should rarely happen, but we still need to guard against this.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this infinite loop problem by also skipping NUMA node that has no
>>>> housekeeping CPU in the inner while loop of init_vp_index(). As the outer
>>>> for loop will only be reached if the housekeeping cpumask isn't empty,
>>>> a NUMA node with housekeeping CPUs will eventually be found.
>>>>
>>>> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/message/20260422030903.E1BFCC2BCB0%40smtp.kernel.org [1]
>>>> Fixes: 6640b5df1a38 ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Don't assign VMbus channel interrupts to isolated CPUs")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c | 7 +++++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
>>>> index 89d214dda360..ed121d74d73f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hv/channel_mgmt.c
>>>> @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static void init_vp_index(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
>>>>    	u32 i, ncpu = num_online_cpus();
>>>>    	cpumask_var_t available_mask;
>>>>    	struct cpumask *allocated_mask;
>>>> +	const struct cpumask *node_mask;
>>>>    	const struct cpumask *hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ);
>>>>    	u32 target_cpu;
>>>>    	int numa_node;
>>>> @@ -780,14 +781,16 @@ static void init_vp_index(struct vmbus_channel *channel)
>>>>    				next_numa_node_id = 0;
>>>>    				continue;
>>>>    			}
>>>> -			if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(numa_node)))
>>>> +			node_mask = cpumask_of_node(numa_node);
>>>> +			if (cpumask_empty(node_mask) ||
>>>> +			    !cpumask_intersects(node_mask, hk_mask))
>>> The cpumask_empty() test looks to be redundant. The
>>> cpumask_intersects() test will catch the case where
>>> node_mask is empty.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I think this looks good as a solution to the core
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Michael
>> Yes, I am aware that cpumask_empty() test is redundant and can be
>> skipped. I keep it just to make it easier to read. I can certainly drop
>> the cpumask_empty() statement.
>>
> The flip side is people like me try to figure out "why is this
> here?", thinking there must be a reason. :-)  I'd say drop the
> code and add a comment like "Also catches an empty node_mask".

Fair, will do that.

Thanks,
Longman

> Michael


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-30 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-27 19:37 Waiman Long
2026-08-27 21:10 ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-29  1:21   ` Waiman Long
2026-08-30 23:17     ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-30 23:39       ` Waiman Long [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d38f7c0-f15d-4568-bc2f-559179ccb45c@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=ssengar@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®