From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: Disable GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY for s390
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:03:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d3de6fc-0991-9cef-d5fd-032fdbe2e85e@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASdfvJsqq8ubpBZJ5yWPMimt=pF_GFBLTJbFytbtw8jxg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/22/21 7:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:18 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/22/21 4:05 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:56:50PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> Commit 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390") disabled
>>>> COMPILE_TEST for s390. At the same time, "make allmodconfig/allyesconfig" for
>>>> s390 is still supported. However, it generates thousands of compiler
>>>> messages such as the following, making it highly impractical to run.
>>>>
>>>> Cyclomatic Complexity 1 scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c:main
>>>> Cyclomatic Complexity 1 scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c:_GLOBAL__sub_I_00100_0_main
>>>>
>>>> Since GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY is primarily used for testing, disable it
>>>> when building s390 images.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Fixes: 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>> ---
>>>> scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig b/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
>>>> index ab9eb4cbe33a..5e9bb500f443 100644
>>>> --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ if GCC_PLUGINS
>>>>
>>>> config GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY
>>>> bool "Compute the cyclomatic complexity of a function" if EXPERT
>>>> - depends on !COMPILE_TEST # too noisy
>>>> + depends on !COMPILE_TEST && !S390 # too noisy
>>>
>>> I don't see a reason to disable this in general for s390. COMPILE_TEST
>>> was only disabled for s390 because a lot of irrelevant configs didn't
>>> compile and it would cause a lot of unnecessary work to fix that.
>>>
>>> However the !COMPILE_TEST dependency here looks more like it was
>>> misused in lack of a possibility to detect if the config was generated
>>> with allyesconfig/allmodconfig. Maybe that could be added somehow to
>>> Kconfig?
>>>
>>
>> That is what COMPILE_TEST used to be for. Not setting it for s390 doesn't
>> just cause this config to be disabled. Lots of other compile tests
>> for s390 are now disabled as well, and code which should be disabled
>> is now enabled. Looking at it, I'd be a bit surprised if allmodconfig/
>> allyesconfig with COMPILE_TEST=y still builds for s390.
>>
>> I agree that COMPILE_TEST it is being misused. However, I think what
>> you'd be looking for is something like COMPILE_TEST_RANDCONFIG.
>> FWIW, in my opinion, randconfig should not enable COMPILE_TEST
>> to start with. But that is a different discussion.
>>
>> Anyway, I can disable GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY manually in my own
>> build tests, so this isn't that much of a problem for me, so feel
>> free to drop this patch.
>>
>> Guenter
>
>
> Maybe, we can add something like CONFIG_SUPPRESS_NOISY_TESTS,
> which is set to y by all{yes,mod}config.
>
> This is self-documenting, so we do not need the '# too noisy' comment.
>
>
>
> config SUPPRESS_NOISY_TESTS
> bool "suppress noisy test"
>
>
> config GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY
> bool "Compute the cyclomatic complexity of a function" if EXPERT
> depends on !SUPPRESS_NOISY_TESTS
>
Good idea. Downside would be that it won't solve the real problem
for s390 (which is lack of allmodconfig/allyesconfig compile test
coverage because COMPILE_TEST isn't set anymore), but that is a
different problem anyway, and my original patch doesn't solve
that either.
On the other side, if that flag would be set explicitly by
all{yes,mod}config, it would really beg for being misused. We
might then as well add a new flag that is explicitly associated
with all{yes,mod}config, but not with randconfig.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-21 22:56 Guenter Roeck
2021-02-22 12:05 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-02-22 15:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-22 15:45 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-22 16:03 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-02-23 11:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-02-23 17:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-23 18:03 ` Heiko Carstens
2021-02-23 18:17 ` Kees Cook
2021-02-24 1:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-24 14:19 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d3de6fc-0991-9cef-d5fd-032fdbe2e85e@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®