From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752089AbeEVTRB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 15:17:01 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:39738 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751748AbeEVTQ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 15:16:58 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpqL9SnC76LGOcd7RInxFLpCSeDOl/6CL7y/oOho8VVj8qlcbsbuf/Gzk2oloXvkgYzY3fjGg== Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Kees Cook , "Martin K. Petersen" , James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , Borislav Petkov , "David S. Miller" , "Manoj N. Kumar" , "Matthew R. Ochs" , Uma Krishnan , linux-block , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <20180522181512.39316-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20180522181512.39316-4-keescook@chromium.org> <20180522183613.GA3784@infradead.org> <732f4249-5681-4a54-ec21-4ecc3d3a74e5@kernel.dk> <20180522191309.GA23615@infradead.org> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <8d4af5c4-96fa-54ee-d5c1-b887b1de5a3c@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 13:16:54 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180522191309.GA23615@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/22/18 1:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> I think Martin and Christoph are objecting to moving the code to >> block/scsi_ioctl.h. I don't care too much about where the code is, but >> think it would be nice to have the definitions in a separate header. But >> if they prefer just pulling in all of SCSI for it, well then I guess >> it's pointless to move the header bits. Seems very heavy handed to me, >> though. > > It might be heavy handed for the 3 remaining users of drivers/ide, Brutal :-) > but as long as that stuff just keeps working I'd rather worry about > everyone else, and keep the scsi code where it belongs. Fine with me then, hopefully we can some day kill it off. -- Jens Axboe