From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
graf@amazon.com, guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com,
henry.willard@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com, jbohac@suse.cz,
joel.granados@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, noodles@fb.com, paul.x.webb@oracle.com,
rppt@kernel.org, sohil.mehta@intel.com,
sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, yifei.l.liu@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ima: verify the previous kernel's IMA buffer lies in addressable RAM
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 15:30:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d780b6eff19fd61096c07768cf730b985d29177.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251231061609.907170-2-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
On Tue, 2025-12-30 at 22:16 -0800, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> When the second-stage kernel is booted with a limiting command line
> (e.g. "mem=<size>"), the IMA measurement buffer handed over from the
> previous kernel may fall outside the addressable RAM of the new kernel.
> Accessing such a buffer can fault during early restore.
>
> Introduce a small generic helper, ima_validate_range(), which verifies
> that a physical [start, end] range for the previous-kernel IMA buffer
> lies within addressable memory:
> - On x86, use pfn_range_is_mapped().
> - On OF based architectures, use page_is_ram().
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2->v3: Update subject to exactly describe the patch [ Suggested by Mimi
> Zohar]
> ---
> include/linux/ima.h | 1 +
> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
> index 8e29cb4e6a01..abf8923f8fc5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ima.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ima.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static inline int ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label,
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC
> int __init ima_free_kexec_buffer(void);
> int __init ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size);
> +int ima_validate_range(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size);
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index 7362f68f2d8b..8b24e3312ea0 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/ima.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> #include <linux/reboot.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include "ima.h"
> @@ -296,3 +298,36 @@ void __init ima_load_kexec_buffer(void)
> pr_debug("Error restoring the measurement list: %d\n", rc);
> }
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * ima_validate_range - verify a physical buffer lies in addressable RAM
> + * @phys: physical start address of the buffer from previous kernel
> + * @size: size of the buffer
> + *
> + * On success return 0. On failure returns -EINVAL so callers can skip
> + * restoring.
> + */
> +int ima_validate_range(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> + phys_addr_t end_phys;
> +
> + if (check_add_overflow(phys, (phys_addr_t)size - 1, &end_phys))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + start_pfn = PHYS_PFN(phys);
> + end_pfn = PHYS_PFN(end_phys);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> + if (!pfn_range_is_mapped(start_pfn, end_pfn))
> +#else
> + if (!page_is_ram(start_pfn) || !page_is_ram(end_pfn))
> +#endif
> + {
> + pr_warn("IMA: previous kernel measurement buffer %pa (size 0x%zx) lies outside available memory\n",
> + &phys, size);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-02 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-31 6:16 [PATCH v3 0/3] Address page fault in ima_restore_measurement_list() Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-12-31 6:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ima: verify the previous kernel's IMA buffer lies in addressable RAM Harshit Mogalapalli
2026-01-02 20:30 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2025-12-31 6:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] of/kexec: refactor ima_get_kexec_buffer() to use ima_validate_range() Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-12-31 6:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/kexec: Add a sanity check on previous kernel's ima kexec buffer Harshit Mogalapalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d780b6eff19fd61096c07768cf730b985d29177.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=henry.willard@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=paul.x.webb@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yifei.l.liu@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®