From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zytor.com (terminus.zytor.com [198.137.202.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9CC358D16; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.136 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768836867; cv=none; b=jOLUKAqn2j2xQVkF2whaFJzvmF/cHE4eTV1K3z3F6r+bZjpeKwpar9LgoxL1IaUPPu3y2gh0aFUYELIJ/uxwofponPoqcdQchSc42vocA+ZVghceKxwTu0T0EEzKYCKx+kmP8FtgV5ZUGDN5762z+spV8YNRRV4Kbv/12HsbVWs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768836867; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NcKInReWm5YQxR5FryyX76yerQYcqrt3nalDSXS7vBA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=MRJwhoSX3lTaJ/2ovVtppuNfsitMknigqMQtwQ0bQMQ/JdhTXNaZME7QZ01SY0I1fq4Z6MFFTLnrV784g9bVoa4qXVbpwmcSB4teW5tHYBFk5wFYdlK33nkJS0PaWNhzJLlLp2coGFg4LrkfvDuAsuYsskq2Mm36AD3jLKm15EU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zytor.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=zytor.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=zytor.com header.i=@zytor.com header.b=VwZi4id+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.136 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zytor.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=zytor.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=zytor.com header.i=@zytor.com header.b="VwZi4id+" Received: from [IPV6:2601:646:8081:9483:13a:c452:d5de:4aa7] ([IPv6:2601:646:8081:9483:13a:c452:d5de:4aa7]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.18.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 60JFXJwl2977448 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:33:46 -0800 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.zytor.com 60JFXJwl2977448 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zytor.com; s=2025122301; t=1768836827; bh=6Jcq5LWRqtEvNJV1i0+wD6XGL3eXImUE64L1x29/M2U=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=VwZi4id+fnAbs5zreO9+d/I5WlNsEfKdh+0/RnPRwMXBng52tcxyLeTf38eRFaQt8 JDYkx6GywQc0Lb/b8iA2gfJDB0lczV+AESHoJcuD6yyx/CbAe+W+V/UsRm0fR0pg6m W0T31rKyJuiDU7iFIvQjMlwBMd3HXNK7vbS7NehIfpiDG3l8xFavNlrLdRqFsFC3qK CyBMNkbOUuU6MTc39nVdhCkyXQfrgCKboVhDUXMJ5zRvYYx35xXww7kRPjYp1+kcO6 kHycRWQqsBvLXygO2I2A3XOR0nGFrjUgOKguNBMdwN0LLhL7d8Zj7FhJuTaYi8xEB2 OgHtq0Flg2iCw== Message-ID: <8deae27e-1e9f-4bc0-8d60-0173cf92942f@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:33:30 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/vdso: Use 32-bit CHECKFLAGS for compat vDSO To: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Thomas Gleixner Cc: "David S. Miller" , Andreas Larsson , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sun Jian References: <20260116-vdso-compat-checkflags-v1-0-4a83b4fbb0d3@linutronix.de> <20260116-vdso-compat-checkflags-v1-2-4a83b4fbb0d3@linutronix.de> <87bjir3nfy.ffs@tglx> <20260119081917-f47ff5da-4465-4b3e-8c94-42b96c932583@linutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US, sv-SE From: "H. Peter Anvin" In-Reply-To: <20260119081917-f47ff5da-4465-4b3e-8c94-42b96c932583@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2026-01-18 23:20, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 11:05:05PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 16 2026 at 08:40, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >>> Manually override the CHECKFLAGS for the compat vDSO with the correct >>> 32-bit configuration. >> >> Fun. I just fixed the same thing half an hour ago: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260117215542.342638347@kernel.org/ > > Assuming you are going to apply your patches bevore, can I respin my > remaining patches on top of tip/x86/entry? > Please do. -hpa