Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: lp87565: Add lp87565 PMIC support

[Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>]

On Tuesday 23 May 2017 01:11 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 12:27 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 May 2017, Keerthy wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 May 2017 11:18 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The LP87565 chip is a power management IC for Portable Navigation Systems
>>>>> and Tablet Computing devices. It contains the following components:
>>>>>
>>>>>         - Configurable Bucks(Single and multi-phase).
>>>>>         - Configurable General Purpose Output Signals (GPO).
>>>>>
>>>>> The LP87565-Q1 variant device uses two 2-phase outputs configuration,
>>>>> Buck0 is master for Buck0/1 output and Buck2 is master for Buck2/3
>>>>> output.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lp87565.txt |  44 ++++
>>>>>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                               |  14 ++
>>>>>  drivers/mfd/Makefile                              |   1 +
>>>>>  drivers/mfd/lp87565.c                             | 103 ++++++++
>>>>>  include/linux/mfd/lp87565.h                       | 275 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  5 files changed, 437 insertions(+)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lp87565.txt
>>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/lp87565.c
>>>>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/lp87565.h
>>>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Author: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> We usually ask for full "first last" names.
>>>
>>> Keerthy is my full name and i do not have a surname.
>>
>> What is the 'J' for in your email address?
> 
> Father's initials.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/11/482

I have been using this for a while now.

> 
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> +static const struct i2c_device_id lp87565_id_table[] = {
>>>>> +	{ "lp87565-q1", 0 },
>>>>> +	{ },
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lp87565_id_table);
>>>>
>>>> Is this an OF only driver, or not?
>>
>> You didn't answer my question?
>>
> 
> Sorry i replied on top again. It will be an OF only driver.
> 
> Regards,
> Keerthy
>