From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752229AbdI0LJl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:09:41 -0400 Received: from smtp-proxy004.phy.lolipop.jp ([157.7.104.45]:54211 "EHLO smtp-proxy004.phy.lolipop.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750703AbdI0LJj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:09:39 -0400 Subject: Re: ALSA: bebob: Use common error handling code in snd_bebob_stream_start_duplex() To: SF Markus Elfring , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Clemens Ladisch , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <85f95150-9cec-7a53-7692-837ba543e1ec@users.sourceforge.net> <541f0f9f-fc87-f65b-bbd8-fec5d45d5d2e@users.sourceforge.net> <3afecbef-b7ac-a4e8-f439-a351916f05e5@users.sourceforge.net> <09bb0e83-01fe-cd12-a084-31db3f12d663@sakamocchi.jp> <06a8e3ee-c3c3-b4c7-0cf9-69a2efdaf0ba@users.sourceforge.net> From: Takashi Sakamoto Message-ID: <8e2bbd25-d8d0-0d7b-2d4e-daf495bd523f@sakamocchi.jp> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:09:31 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06a8e3ee-c3c3-b4c7-0cf9-69a2efdaf0ba@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sep 27 2017 15:38, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> As long as I know, the last product with this solution was shipped >> at 2010. Thus the driver is under maintenance. > > Thanks for your information. > > >> I have some tasks for this driver as well as drivers in ALSA firewire stack, >> however basically this driver is under maintenance and might not get >> further integration. > > Good to know in principle … > > >> I think that code cleanup for the driver don't help the other developers. > > I thought in an other direction if other contributors would like to care > for longer term support. > > >> It's better to apply such cleanup to more long-live codes such as >> core functionality of ALSA. > > I am trying another general transformation pattern out. > > >> In this point of view, whether your patchset is worth to be applied >> or not, Please keep enough time to think about. > > Automatic source code analysis can find various update candidates. > I am just unsure if a bit more software development attention is still > appropriate at some places. > > Do you find any of the affected software modules so outdated > so that they should not be touched any more? Please don't ignore the practicality I've explained, and don't accumulate your questions without it. Regards Takashi Sakamoto