Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add ipq8064 board variants

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 11/20/25 2:54 PM, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Document QCOM ipq8064 board variants ipq8062, ipq8065, ipq8066,
> ipq8068, ipq8069 now matched by the QCOM cpufreq nvmem driver if
> socinfo can't derive the variant from SMEM.
> 
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml         | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> index 18b5ed044f9f..0eb1619fede8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> @@ -299,12 +299,32 @@ properties:
>                - qcom,ipq5424-rdp466
>            - const: qcom,ipq5424
>  
> +      - items:
> +          - const: qcom,ipq8062
> +          - const: qcom,ipq8064

Since 'items' requires that all items are present (and in this order),
we would normally have a board name go first.. but I suppose this is
some sort of a fix to the issue that sparked this (posting the link
for others to have more context)

But since these SoCs do exist, I wouldn't say this is necessarily
wrong..

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20251105112136.371376-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com/

Konrad