From: Chris PeBenito <pebenito@ieee.org>
To: "Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Christian Göttsche" <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>,
Xiong Zhenwu <xiong.zhenwu@zte.com.cn>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] selinux: split no transition execve check
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:42:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ea4d17a-f2fd-b6a5-b988-0edbc63022f6@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhTCf4L9rif-+7gTK64JoUiDv28DFwS1vUsvzv8rG+JCuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/26/22 17:51, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 9:59 AM Christian Göttsche
> <cgzones@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In case a setuid or setgid binary is mislabeled with a generic context,
>> either via a policy mistake or a move by the distribution package,
>> executing it will be checked by the file permission execute_no_trans on
>> the generic file context (e.g. bin_t). The setuid(2)/setgid(2) syscall
>> within will then be checked against the unchanged caller process
>> context, which might have been granted the capability permission setuid/
>> setgid to initially drop privileges. To avoid that scenario split the
>> execute_no_trans permission in case of a setuid/setgid binary into a new
>> permission execute_sxid_no_trans.
>>
>> For backward compatibility this behavior is contained in a new policy
>> capability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
>> ---
>> security/selinux/hooks.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +-
>> security/selinux/include/policycap.h | 1 +
>> security/selinux/include/policycap_names.h | 3 ++-
>> security/selinux/include/security.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Adding the refpolicy list to this thread as their opinion seems
> particularly relevant to this discussion.
>
> FWIW, this looks reasonable to me but I would like to hear what others
> have to say.
I think this a band-aid to cover up the real problem, which is the mislabeled files.
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
>> index 5b6895e4fc29..b825fee39a70 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
>> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
>> @@ -2348,9 +2348,16 @@ static int selinux_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>> ad.u.file = bprm->file;
>>
>> if (new_tsec->sid == old_tsec->sid) {
>> + u32 perm;
>> +
>> + if (selinux_policycap_execute_sxid_no_trans() && is_sxid(inode->i_mode))
>> + perm = FILE__EXECUTE_SXID_NO_TRANS;
>> + else
>> + perm = FILE__EXECUTE_NO_TRANS;
>> +
>> rc = avc_has_perm(&selinux_state,
>> old_tsec->sid, isec->sid,
>> - SECCLASS_FILE, FILE__EXECUTE_NO_TRANS, &ad);
>> + SECCLASS_FILE, perm, &ad);
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>> } else {
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>> index 35aac62a662e..53a1eeeb86fb 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>> +++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct security_class_mapping secclass_map[] = {
>> "quotaget", "watch", NULL } },
>> { "file",
>> { COMMON_FILE_PERMS,
>> - "execute_no_trans", "entrypoint", NULL } },
>> + "execute_no_trans", "entrypoint", "execute_sxid_no_trans", NULL } },
>> { "dir",
>> { COMMON_FILE_PERMS, "add_name", "remove_name",
>> "reparent", "search", "rmdir", NULL } },
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/policycap.h b/security/selinux/include/policycap.h
>> index 2ec038efbb03..23929dc3e1db 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/include/policycap.h
>> +++ b/security/selinux/include/policycap.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ enum {
>> POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_CGROUPSECLABEL,
>> POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_NNP_NOSUID_TRANSITION,
>> POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_GENFS_SECLABEL_SYMLINKS,
>> + POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_EXECUTE_SXID_NO_TRANS,
>> __POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX
>> };
>> #define POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX (__POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX - 1)
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/policycap_names.h b/security/selinux/include/policycap_names.h
>> index b89289f092c9..4c014c2cf352 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/include/policycap_names.h
>> +++ b/security/selinux/include/policycap_names.h
>> @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ const char *selinux_policycap_names[__POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX] = {
>> "always_check_network",
>> "cgroup_seclabel",
>> "nnp_nosuid_transition",
>> - "genfs_seclabel_symlinks"
>> + "genfs_seclabel_symlinks",
>> + "execute_sxid_no_trans",
>> };
>>
>> #endif /* _SELINUX_POLICYCAP_NAMES_H_ */
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/security.h b/security/selinux/include/security.h
>> index ac0ece01305a..ab95241b6b7b 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/include/security.h
>> +++ b/security/selinux/include/security.h
>> @@ -219,6 +219,14 @@ static inline bool selinux_policycap_genfs_seclabel_symlinks(void)
>> return READ_ONCE(state->policycap[POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_GENFS_SECLABEL_SYMLINKS]);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool selinux_policycap_execute_sxid_no_trans(void)
>> +{
>> + struct selinux_state *state = &selinux_state;
>> +
>> + return READ_ONCE(state->policycap[POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_EXECUTE_SXID_NO_TRANS]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> struct selinux_policy_convert_data;
>>
>> struct selinux_load_state {
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
>
--
Chris PeBenito
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-25 14:59 Christian Göttsche
2022-01-26 22:51 ` Paul Moore
2022-01-27 13:42 ` Chris PeBenito [this message]
2022-01-28 1:47 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ea4d17a-f2fd-b6a5-b988-0edbc63022f6@ieee.org \
--to=pebenito@ieee.org \
--cc=cgzones@googlemail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux-refpolicy@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=xiong.zhenwu@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®