From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Question] Calling request_firmware under the spinlocks in file advansys.c
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:16:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ec2185d-203e-71fa-c274-65faf338820f@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57EA5769.1080807@oracle.com>
On 09/27/2016 01:26 PM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 13 September 2016 02:48 PM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the file drivers/scsi/advansys.c we are calling function AdvISR at 2 instances
>> [in the function advansys_reset and advansys_interrupt] while holding spinlock.
>> Function AdvISR eventually calls request_firmware following this sequence of
>> routines:
>>
>> AdvISR -> adv_async_callback -> AdvResetChipAndSB -> AdvInitAsc3550Driver ->
>> request_firmware
>>
>> According to the definition of request_firmware it should be called from user
>> context where sleeping is allowed. And usually sleeping under the spin lock is
>> not allowed. Is it really necessary to call AdvISR under spinlocks here? Are
>> we taking care of sleeping related concern of request_firmware or am I
>> overlooking something here?
>
> Hi,
>
> Any comments on this?
>
AdvISR is the main interrupt handling routine, for which we definitely
will want to have interupts disabled. Plus the SCSI parallel drivers
(ab-) use the interrupt routine to do all sorts of things, and are
thereby well versed to keep interrupts disabled for an extented amount
of time.
However, we don't really have a good way of handling a request firmware
here; we probably would need to implement a workqueue to handle this
properly ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-13 9:18 Vaishali Thakkar
2016-09-27 11:26 ` Vaishali Thakkar
2016-09-27 15:16 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ec2185d-203e-71fa-c274-65faf338820f@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=vaishali.thakkar@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®