Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix the way to wake up issue_flush thread

[Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>]

Please avoid this patch, I make a mistake.

On 2018/5/3 15:45, Yunlong Song wrote:
> Commit 6f890df0 ("f2fs: fix out-of-order execution in f2fs_issue_flush")
> uses waitqueue_active to wake up issue_flush thread, but there is no
> wait entry to wake in this queue, so change it back to use the original
> fcc->dispatch_list to wake up issue_flush thread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 503a98a..5aa5ee4e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
>   	/* update issue_list before we wake up issue_flush thread */
>   	smp_mb();
>   
> -	if (waitqueue_active(&fcc->flush_wait_queue))
> +	if (!fcc->dispatch_list)
>   		wake_up(&fcc->flush_wait_queue);
>   
>   	if (fcc->f2fs_issue_flush) {

-- 
Thanks,
Yunlong Song