From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753914AbeEaEpU (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 00:45:20 -0400 Received: from fllnx210.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.17]:31997 "EHLO fllnx210.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbeEaEpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 00:45:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] clk: davinci: outstanding fixes To: Michael Turquette , David Lechner , Stephen Boyd CC: , , Kevin Hilman , References: <20180525181150.17873-1-david@lechnology.com> <20180530200947.982.19495@harbor.lan> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <8f188ff5-50d1-f128-ecc5-d25edda325d4@ti.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 10:13:40 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180530200947.982.19495@harbor.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 31 May 2018 01:39 AM, Michael Turquette wrote: > Hi David, > > Quoting David Lechner (2018-05-25 11:11:41) >> This is a resend of all of the outstanding DaVinci clock patches plus one new >> patch. All of the patches (except the new one) have been reviewed and tested >> by someone other than me. >> >> The new patch ("clk: davinci: Fix link errors when not all SoCs are enabled") >> should be fairly trivial. >> >> I am resending them all in one series to hopefully make it easier to get them >> picked up by having them in the correct order to avoid merge conflicts. This >> series is based on the clk/clk-davinci-psc-da830 branch. > > I picked them all and pushed to clk/clk-davinci based on -rc1. There are > some comments on the individual patches, all of which are of the "please > revisit this and fix it up later" variety. > > Going forward I'm happy for you and/or Sekhar to send clk PRs to Stephen > and myself. The same rules apply for PRs: all patches need to be posted > to the list the old fashioned way for review. But PRs make our lives a > bit easier, especially when dealing with chip variants from the same SoC > family like we have with davinci. Thanks Mike! David is listed as maintainer for drivers/clk/davinci/* and I believe he can be generating pull requests going forward. I can work as the backup, of course. Regards, Sekhar