From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@codelabs.ch>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, osalvador@suse.de
Cc: luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix marking of unused sub-pmd ranges
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 11:04:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2af450-1080-2dcd-9c85-6190e7e14f27@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509090637.24152-2-ken@codelabs.ch>
On 09.05.22 11:06, Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger wrote:
> The unused part precedes the new range spanned by the start, end
> parameters of vmemmap_use_new_sub_pmd. This means it actually goes from
> ALIGN_DOWN(start, PMD_SIZE) up to start. Use the correct address when
> applying the mark using memset.
>
> Fixes: 8d400913c231 ("x86/vmemmap: handle unpopulated sub-pmd ranges")
> Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@codelabs.ch>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 96d34ebb20a9..e2942335d143 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,8 @@ static void __meminit vmemmap_use_sub_pmd(unsigned long start, unsigned long end
>
> static void __meminit vmemmap_use_new_sub_pmd(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> + const unsigned long page = ALIGN_DOWN(start, PMD_SIZE);
> +
> vmemmap_flush_unused_pmd();
>
> /*
> @@ -914,8 +916,7 @@ static void __meminit vmemmap_use_new_sub_pmd(unsigned long start, unsigned long
> * Mark with PAGE_UNUSED the unused parts of the new memmap range
> */
> if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, PMD_SIZE))
> - memset((void *)start, PAGE_UNUSED,
> - start - ALIGN_DOWN(start, PMD_SIZE));
> + memset((void *)page, PAGE_UNUSED, start - page);
>
> /*
> * We want to avoid memset(PAGE_UNUSED) when populating the vmemmap of
As the x86 code was based on my s390x code, I assume that this was
accidentally introduced in the x86 variant.
We'd be marking the wrong range PAGE_UNUSED.
Your fix looks correct to me:
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Do we want to cc stable?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-12 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 9:06 Unhandled page fault in vmemmap_populate on x86_64 Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
2022-05-09 9:06 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix marking of unused sub-pmd ranges Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
2022-05-12 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-05-12 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 7:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-05-13 10:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f2af450-1080-2dcd-9c85-6190e7e14f27@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ken@codelabs.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®