From: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Sync se's load_avg with cfs_rq in reweight_task
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:26:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f358bc7-e1ed-4631-bdc1-4134b8f84a34@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66ee1520-48b8-4229-8bdd-9746c8bea5fe@bytedance.com>
-------- 转发的消息 --------
主题: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Sync se's load_avg with cfs_rq in
reweight_task
日期: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:06:33 +0800
From: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
收件人: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, K Prateek Nayak
<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
抄送: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev
Hello Qais,
在 2024/7/29 04:14, Qais Yousef 写道:
> On 07/22/24 10:47, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> (+ Qais)
>>
>> Hello Chuyi,
>>
>> On 7/20/2024 10:42 AM, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>>> In reweight_task(), there are two situations:
>>>
>>> 1. The task was on_rq, then the task's load_avg is accurate because we
>>> synchronized it with cfs_rq through update_load_avg() in dequeue_task().
>>>
>>> 2. The task is sleeping, its load_avg might not have been updated for some
>>> time, which can result in inaccurate dequeue_load_avg() in
>>> reweight_entity().
>>>
>>> This patch solves this by using update_load_avg() to synchronize the
>>> load_avg of se with cfs_rq. For tasks were on_rq, since we already update
>>> load_avg to accurate values in dequeue_task(), this change will not have
>>> other effects due to the short time interval between the two updates.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - change the description in commit log.
>>> - use update_load_avg() in reweight_task() rather than in reweight_entity
>>> suggested by chengming.
>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240716150840.23061-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com/
>>> ---
>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> index 9057584ec06d..b1e07ce90284 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> @@ -3835,12 +3835,15 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
>>> }
>>> }
>>> +static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags);
>>> +
>>> void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, const struct load_weight *lw)
>>> {
>>> struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>>> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>>> struct load_weight *load = &se->load;
>>> + update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0);
>
> White space and a comment perhaps?
>
> LGTM anyway.
Thanks for taking a look, will send another patch later.
(V3
link:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240723114247.104848-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com/)
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <66ee1520-48b8-4229-8bdd-9746c8bea5fe@bytedance.com>
2024-07-30 10:26 ` Chuyi Zhou [this message]
2024-07-20 5:12 Chuyi Zhou
2024-07-22 5:17 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-07-22 6:40 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-07-22 8:15 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-07-28 20:14 ` Qais Yousef
2024-07-22 6:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-07-22 9:39 ` Chuyi Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f358bc7-e1ed-4631-bdc1-4134b8f84a34@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®