mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jonas.gorski@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
	olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rafal@milecki.pl,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jon.mason@broadcom.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] net: dsa: b53: restore the NSP IMP port 2 Gbps mode
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 15:25:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f49edbd-9916-4fcf-ac9d-5ccc7ac97f4b@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179365621756.3131.9531361745901719210@kernel.org>

On 11/2/26 13:50, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
> 
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
> 
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
> 
> - [Medium] The new code in b53_phylink_mac_link_up()
>    (drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c) sets speed = 2000 on every…
> 
> --
> 
> net: dsa: b53: restore the NSP IMP port 2 Gbps mode
> 
> On BCM5301x and NSP, fixed-link CPU ports now get forced flow control and a
> 2 Gbps speed in b53_phylink_mac_link_up(). The goal is to restore the
> proprietary 2 Gbps mode on the IMP port. That mode was lost because the
> fixed-link description reports 1 Gbps.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> index 0880310c9ce3f..743fc04da0a48 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
>> @@ -1663,9 +1663,15 @@ static void b53_phylink_mac_link_up(struct phylink_config *config,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (mode == MLO_AN_FIXED) {
>> -		/* Force flow control on BCM5301x's CPU port */
>> -		if (is5301x(dev) && dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
>> -			tx_pause = rx_pause = true;
>> +		/* Force flow control and 2Gbits/sec on BCM5301x and NSP CPU
>> +		 * ports
>> +		 */
>> +		if ((is5301x(dev) || dev->chip_id == BCM58XX_DEVICE_ID) &&
>> +		    dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port)) {
>> +			tx_pause = true;
>> +			rx_pause = true;
>> +			speed = 2000;
>> +		}
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this set up 2 Gbps correctly when the CPU port is not the IMP port?
> 
> The check is dsa_is_cpu_port() rather than port == dev->imp_port, so a
> fixed-link CPU port on port 5 or 7 also gets speed = 2000. Those ports go
> through the GMII override register in b53_force_port_config():
> 
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c:b53_force_port_config() {
>      ...
> 	} else {
> 		off = B53_GMII_PORT_OVERRIDE_CTRL(port);
> 		val = GMII_PO_EN;
> 	}
>      ...
> 	reg &= ~(0x3 << GMII_PO_SPEED_S);
> 	if (is5301x(dev) || is58xx(dev))
> 		reg &= ~PORT_OVERRIDE_SPEED_2000M;
> 
> 	switch (speed) {
> 	case 2000:
> 		reg |= PORT_OVERRIDE_SPEED_2000M;
> 		fallthrough;
>      ...
> }
> 
> The two registers use different bit layouts in b53_regs.h:
> 
> #define   PORT_OVERRIDE_SPEED_2000M	BIT(6)
> #define   PORT_OVERRIDE_EN		BIT(7)
> ...
> #define   GMII_PO_EN			BIT(6)
> #define   GMII_PO_SPEED_2000M		BIT(7)
> 
> So on the GMII register, the 2000 case sets and clears BIT(6), which is
> GMII_PO_EN. GMII_PO_SPEED_2000M (BIT(7)) is never written. The port ends up
> at 1 Gbps, and its 2 Gbps bit keeps whatever value it already had.
> 
> Some upstream 5301x device trees use port 5 as a fixed-link CPU port, for
> example bcm53015-meraki-mr26.dts and bcm53016-meraki-mr32.dts. bgmac-bcma
> sets BGMAC_FEAT_FORCE_SPEED_2500 for these GMACs, so the speed mismatch the
> commit message describes would remain on those links.
> 
> The new comment and the commit message both say 2 Gbps is forced on
> "BCM5301x and NSP CPU ports". Should this either be limited to
> port == dev->imp_port, with the comment updated to match, or should
> b53_force_port_config() use GMII_PO_SPEED_2000M for the GMII override
> register?

Not necessarily, while it is preferable to use the IMP port, 
functionally it still makes sense to be able to prime the non-IMP CPU 
ports to 2Gbits/sec should we desire so.

There is a separate patch set to address the 2Gbits/sec override.
-- 
Florian

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29 21:15 [PATCH net v4 0/2] Fix TCP retransmissions on NS/NSP SoCs Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 21:15 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] net: ethernet: bgmac: preserve forced 2.5 Gbps link speed Florian Fainelli
2026-11-02 21:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 23:24     ` Florian Fainelli
2026-10-29 21:15 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] net: dsa: b53: restore the NSP IMP port 2 Gbps mode Florian Fainelli
2026-11-02 21:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 23:25     ` Florian Fainelli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8f49edbd-9916-4fcf-ac9d-5ccc7ac97f4b@broadcom.com \
    --to=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=jon.mason@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jonas.gorski@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®