Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support variable clocking

[neil.armstrong@linaro.org]

On 25/05/2023 17:57, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:39 AM Neil Armstrong
> <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/05/2023 14:49, Adam Ford wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:45 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 8:49 PM Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Inki,
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't heard back from you on whether or not you want the bindings
>>>>> patch to be included with me resending the series as V7 or if you're
>>>>> OK with a single, stand-alone patch.
>>>>> Will you let me know?  I have the patch standing by waiting for
>>>>> instructions.  If you're not the right person to ask, please let me
>>>>> know who the right person is.
>>>>
>>>> Neil has also been collecting samsung-dsim patches. Maybe he can clarify.
>>>
>>> If it matters, my preference all along was to do the bindings as a
>>> separate thing once the driver updates were merged into the tree.
>>> Since the bindings can be done in different ways, I was hoping to have
>>> a separate discussion on the right way to do the bindings. If they
>>> need to be part of the series, I can do that.
>>
>> If you don't introduce compatibles, no need to send bindings, it can
>> be send separately.
> 
> This series doesn't change any compatibility.
> 
>>
>> Can I apply this serie and 20230503163313.2640898-2-frieder@fris.de ? seems all has been reviewed.
> 
> Looking at the driver, it looks like linux-next has some newer
> features added into the driver since I started, so this series might
> need a re-base.  If that's the case, let me know, and I'll do the
> re-base.

Ok I'll pull the other bits and let you know if this one needs a rebase.

Neil

> 
> adam
> 
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>>
>>> adam
>>