From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D45A12D1EA; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729592398; cv=none; b=ZnQ/WfcaDRz1As/clv0WVpE0DW3UvZ3eJhdBNad0zW89QRQrUj3nfOfrnK1XMKdE2yPDz/O3E9+8Y0wrDbc6Tv6AKU3j+XUR15iX6GCSSnDxWM8q3JlsxgewlZgPJyojj8suB0W2ovHKUJHYesVWYbzxDlSJhO/KLADrM+F2Kys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729592398; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5DHY+qnatij+MGCadRUcaUBKEvw0C69Oa6l9LhfDZpA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VktDw7/N3depV+l5Q9j1t1P/jI41962+QjORmeuQ4q5bTFdtSn/+bXSwI956dKOK9MHlxZlyn+0jMknHuD0p2w6SANX8FPJoKOgzotvF08UypwVDXatwx/rAf58jJ7m8riySo4Gc2g+EoP/EIb57mNlJuZcycjvLYI74jlhNSAs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269C497; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 03:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.65.67] (unknown [10.57.65.67]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 619703F71E; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 03:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f7fdfe6-f29c-46e0-ae85-c2f794ee268d@arm.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:21:05 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] thermal: core: Reimplement locking through guards To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , Linux PM , Daniel Lezcano , Zhang Rui , Srinivas Pandruvada , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <4985597.31r3eYUQgx@rjwysocki.net> <81c752c1-6f51-4aae-ac25-98214c9b9da0@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Lukasz Luba In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10/22/24 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> This is a continuation of >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ >>>>> >>>>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. >>>>> >>>>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ >>>>> >>>>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]). >>>>> >>>>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. >>>>> >>>>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices >>>>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex >>>>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. >>>> >>>> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch >>>> in linux-pm.git. >>> >>> I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC >>> session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've >>> just queued it up for 6.13. >> >> If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow. > > No, it isn't, please do! OK, I will do that today.