From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Zhe Liu <liuzhe1@kylinos.cn>,
tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-iocost: account flush sequence latency only once
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:49:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f8d1c9e-da88-45a9-bbe0-c1b1403e949c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029092424.764545-1-liuzhe1@kylinos.cn>
Hi, Zhe
在 2026/10/29 17:24, Zhe Liu 写道:
> A flush sequence with a DATA phase can complete its original request
> twice. Both completions invoke ioc_rqos_done(), causing the request to
> contribute two latency samples and adding the same queue wait time
> twice. This gives such requests disproportionate weight compared to
> ordinary writes, distorting the device-wide latency and queue wait
> feedback used to adjust iocost's virtual time rate.
>
> Skip requests marked RQF_FLUSH_SEQ in ioc_rqos_done(). The flag is set
> when the request enters the flush machinery and is still set when the
> data phase completes; blk_flush_restore_request() clears it before the
> final completion, so accounting happens only once, after the whole
> sequence finishes. The remaining sample covers the request's lifetime
> through any postflush, and its queue wait time is accumulated only
> once.
>
> Fixes: 7caa47151ab2e ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Zhe Liu <liuzhe1@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> block/blk-iocost.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
> index 2ae40138e041..601029221e6f 100644
> --- a/block/blk-iocost.c
> +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
> @@ -2868,6 +2868,9 @@ static void ioc_rqos_done(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
> if (!ioc->enabled || !rq->alloc_time_ns || !rq->start_time_ns)
> return;
>
> + if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ)
> + return;
> +
> switch (req_op(rq)) {
> case REQ_OP_READ:
> pidx = QOS_RLAT;
Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 9:24 Zhe Liu
2026-10-29 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-30 1:49 ` Tao Cui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f8d1c9e-da88-45a9-bbe0-c1b1403e949c@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuzhe1@kylinos.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®