From: "Aaron Durbin" <adurbin@google.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Avoid NMI Watchdog and/or long wait in setup_APIC_timer
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:44:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f95bb250708081744le5e5216k13087d05211a4056@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708090226.24002.ak@suse.de>
On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 August 2007 01:17:19 Aaron Durbin wrote:
> > In setup_APIC_timer with the HPET in use, a condition can arise while
> > waiting for the next irq slice to expire on the HPET which will either
> > cause an NMI watchdog to fire or a 3 minute busy loop if the NMI
> > watchdog is disabled.
> >
> > The HPET comparator and the counter keep incrementing during its normal
> > operation. When a comparison event fires the comparator will increment
> > by the designated period. If the HPET trigger occurs right after
> > the 'int trigger = hpet_readl(HPET_T0_CMP);' line, we will will spin
> > for up to 3 minutes (with a clock of 25MHz) waiting for the HPET
> > counter to wrap around. However, when the NMI watchdog is enabled the
> > NMI watchdog will detect a lockup and reboot the machine. This
> > scenario can be exasperated by the presence of an SMI which will
> > increase the window of opportunity for the condition to occur.
>
> Nasty.
>
> Iirc the clockevents code did away with the synchronization
> completely because Thomas determined it was useless because long term
> it'll drift anyways. So perhaps it could be just removed?
>
I was thinking along the same lines as well, but I really didn't know how
important all that code was for waiting for the next irq slice. I'm not time
expert, but I would imagine we would resynchronize correctly in the future after
this code path?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 23:17 Aaron Durbin
2007-08-09 0:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-09 0:44 ` Aaron Durbin [this message]
2007-08-09 0:50 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-09 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-09 21:16 ` Aaron Durbin
2007-08-09 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-09 3:45 Aaron Durbin
2007-08-08 23:08 Aaron Durbin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f95bb250708081744le5e5216k13087d05211a4056@mail.gmail.com \
--to=adurbin@google.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®