From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941763AbcLWT2M (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 14:28:12 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:39318 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758431AbcLWT2D (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 14:28:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hwmon updates for v4.10 (take 2) To: Linus Torvalds References: <1482432934-22961-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <8fa4bce2-6bd7-8eee-91e7-5b7cb3885549@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:27:58 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/23/2016 10:35 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> As mentioned in the tag, this patch series was auto-generated using coccinelle. >> I would like to have it applied either now or right after -rc1, at your >> preference. > > My preference is to not apply it at all. > > Several of the commit messages I looked at were actively misleading, > talking about the coccinelle transformation for the RO case, but then > the patch itself was actually RW. > > I'm not going to bother with this kind of broken thing the day before > xmas eve. > > This will not be pulled. > Ok, fair enough. I'll clean it up and wait for the next window. Guenter