mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] smp: Fix the comments of smp_call_function_many()
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:24:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fae1b1f-9358-71e7-18fd-0ed434d5a7f4@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dda484cf-d974-dba3-db54-4df470a1ff2e@infradead.org>



On 2021/12/14 23:56, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/14/21 00:10, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> As commit a32a4d8a815c ("smp: Run functions concurrently in
>> smp_call_function_many_cond()") itself says:
>>                   "Keep other smp_call_function_many() semantic as it is
>> today for backward compatibility: the called function is not executed in
>> this case locally."
>>
>> It's clear that, the function header comments of smp_call_function_many()
>> does not need to be changed.
>>
>> So move the comment about 'scf_flags' to smp_call_function_many_cond(),
>> and restore the original comments of smp_call_function_many().
>>
>> Finally, the comments have been simplified slightly to avoid duplication.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/smp.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> v1 --> v2:
>> Delete some duplicate comments.
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index 01a7c1706a58b1d..9cbe2509d1010ea 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -853,14 +853,17 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
>>  
>>  /*
>> - * Flags to be used as scf_flags argument of smp_call_function_many_cond().
>> - *
>>   * %SCF_WAIT:		Wait until function execution is completed
>>   * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL:	Run also locally if local cpu is set in cpumask
>>   */
>>  #define SCF_WAIT	(1U << 0)
>>  #define SCF_RUN_LOCAL	(1U << 1)
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * smp_call_function_many_cond(): Run a function on a set of CPUs.
>> + * @scf_flags: Bitmask that controls the operation. Such as SCF_WAIT,
>> + *             SCF_RUN_LOCAL.
>> + */
>>  static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>>  					smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
>>  					unsigned int scf_flags,
>> @@ -972,14 +975,12 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>>  }
>>  
>>  /**
>> - * smp_call_function_many(): Run a function on a set of CPUs.
>> + * smp_call_function_many(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
>>   * @mask: The set of cpus to run on (only runs on online subset).
>>   * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
>>   * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
>> - * @wait: Bitmask that controls the operation. If %SCF_WAIT is set, wait
>> - *        (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs. If
>> - *        %SCF_RUN_LOCAL is set, the function will also be run locally
>> - *        if the local CPU is set in the @cpumask.
>> + * @wait: If true, wait (atomically) until function has completed
>> + *        on other CPUs.
>>   *
>>   * If @wait is true, then returns once @func has returned.
>>   *
> 
> After applying this patch, kernel-doc emits 4 warnings:
> 
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'mask' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'
> smp.c:871: warning: Function parameter or member 'cond_func' not described in 'smp_call_function_many_cond'

OK, I will complete the comments in the next version. Thanks.


> 
> 
> thanks.
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-15  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14  8:10 Zhen Lei
2021-12-14 15:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-12-15  8:24   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8fae1b1f-9358-71e7-18fd-0ed434d5a7f4@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®