Re: RDMA/hns: dead empty check on head->root in setup_root_hem?

[Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>]

On 2026/5/20 4:28, Maoyi Xie wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> While auditing list_first_entry callsites, I noticed a place in
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c where the developer
> wrote a NULL check for an empty list but used the unsafe API.
> The check is dead code. I would appreciate it if you could take
> a look and let me know whether this is worth fixing.
> 
> The site is setup_root_hem() (linux-7.1-rc1, around line 1270):
> 
>     root_hem = list_first_entry(&head->root,
>                                 struct hns_roce_hem_item, list);
>     if (!root_hem)
>             return -ENOMEM;
> 
>     total = 0;
>     for (i = 0; i < region_cnt && total <= max_ba_num; i++) {
>             ...
>             cpu_base = root_hem->addr + total * BA_BYTE_LEN;
>             ...
> 
> list_first_entry() returns container_of(&head->root, struct
> hns_roce_hem_item, list) when head->root is empty, never NULL.
> The -ENOMEM early return is dead code.
> 
> With an empty head->root, the fall through pointer aliases
> &head->root inside struct hns_roce_hem_head. root_hem->addr is
> then read from memory at a fixed offset inside that struct,
> producing a garbage DMA base address that is then handed to
> the hardware.
> 
> head->root is empty if the caller fails to allocate and add the
> root item before calling setup_root_hem. A future caller could
> also miss that precondition.
> 
> A candidate fix is a one liner. Switch to list_first_entry_or_null
> so the -ENOMEM early return runs.
> 
> Similar dead empty checks after list_first_entry have been
> cleaned up in the same shape, for example commit fbb8bc408027
> (net: qed: Remove redundant NULL checks after list_first_entry),
> commit c708d3fad421 (crypto: atmel: use list_first_entry_or_null
> to simplify find_dev) and commit 10379171f346 (ksmbd: use
> list_first_entry_or_null for opinfo_get_list). The qed commit
> message describes the exact shape we observe here. This hns
> site appears to be missed by those cleanups.
> 
> If this is intentional or already known, please disregard.
> Otherwise I am happy to send a [PATCH] or to leave the fix to
> you.

Please send a patch, thanks!

Junxian

> 
> Thanks,
> Maoyi Xie
> https://maoyixie.com/