mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Rice <rob.rice@broadcom.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: bcm: Replace tasklet with threaded irq
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:55:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <900BDAE9-8FF1-41C8-B909-D897BCAF3445@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115035327.xckiigalv3qps7ke@offworld>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2477 bytes --]

Davidlohr,

I haven’t worked on this driver for 4 years. So my memory is a little vague. But I have notes that we found using the tasklet was 40% faster than threaded IRQ. We were trying to get performance up. So that seemed important at the time. I’m not prepared to defend that now. :-)

Rob

> On Jan 14, 2021, at 10:53 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, Jassi Brar wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 6:21 PM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Tasklets have long been deprecated as being too heavy on the system
>>> by running in irq context - and this is not a performance critical
>>> path. If a higher priority process wants to run, it must wait for
>>> the tasklet to finish before doing so.
>>> 
>>> Use a more suitable alternative such as threaded irqs and do the
>>> async work in process context.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
>>> ---
>> Please cc the author and other contributors to this file, esp when
>> this is vendor specific code.
> 
> So looking at who to Cc I noticed:
> 
> commit 8aef00f090bcbe5237c5a6628e7c000890267efe
> Author: Rob Rice <rob.rice@broadcom.com>
> Date:   Mon Nov 14 13:26:01 2016 -0500
> 
>    mailbox: bcm-pdc: Convert from threaded IRQ to tasklet
> 
>    Previously used threaded IRQs in the PDC driver to defer
>    processing the rx DMA ring after getting an rx done interrupt.
>    Instead, use a tasklet at normal priority for deferred processing.
> 
> ... which is exactly the opposite of what modern Linux should be
> doing. Rob, could this not be done in process context?
> 
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr


-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4154 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-15 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-15  0:21 Davidlohr Bueso
2021-01-15  1:23 ` Jassi Brar
2021-01-15  3:53   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-01-15 21:55     ` Rob Rice [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=900BDAE9-8FF1-41C8-B909-D897BCAF3445@broadcom.com \
    --to=rob.rice@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®