From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C210D2877FA; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 21:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761169108; cv=none; b=C2HIg7wosy/j7nrEZzOm5l1SaxbBg0y53oc8s6rPB+PW1VI78BCAPl3IlUdMgTVU14z9uErghILzvlwwWV1AkMtIqfvrJ9AZxbEE+yhiai6sNsDFuJWgc1swFIwhq5jYurbWnE7oyvmK80Z2dZBAbaEZux7UhBy4yioZf5c4uTo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761169108; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n8Zw4/wL2Bpk+jmRSKZmBt8iLjAPrPIC2YC696U3FzI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WnCgQJwb/0GBs5HhwmlKV0hbKHD5GpzcItdTGGsm7OYCXRDIatS5GuhsfxyF7w13vm49s82e+mvFgb7CvzErTqxjIONFwYaWppkHA6RSqDc8+ImjUxclPWZ8BgE+p97uUeSPL31xiuZl7kZdGI+bI8H0hDtaZt6bVJTFvujCeTk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=VJLcnh4a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="VJLcnh4a" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1761169104; bh=n8Zw4/wL2Bpk+jmRSKZmBt8iLjAPrPIC2YC696U3FzI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=VJLcnh4ayIO1ND/GoKsNFJdVA/pHuQxF9EjhZPaze5oYyuV2XxVy1RgsGoBbS9e3R LxfwaTNytcnZ3SHg4N+wIxhbuFKFSyhLtuGg7QSZEmIvFbxKwvXrW89NVknVpWuM9A j/KZ2Limkj9/FbGzuIHFuNacceSReGYosvvPu4w3+x1e6O+J8oRdgpE7w2tEsjfix0 4E1fLU9qWr9QWCWM+ZD5vwEAYDv5t2O42PpmF7otv1MGxjZLPlSIHNcghyvSFS3SbM TSZcZ0I87q2UY8tqjLbUpSWfoDhuhschIAn7cID9uD0KoRGmDsXiUfrn9i6OIE8fWb ZoF+qOUJ4obvw== Received: from [10.40.0.100] (185-67-175-126.lampert.tv [185.67.175.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mriesch) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF2FD17E00AC; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 23:38:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9063b2d2-d496-4577-8e71-885760e41410@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 23:38:22 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/18] media: rockchip: add a driver for the rockchip camera interface To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Mehdi Djait , Maxime Chevallier , =?UTF-8?Q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= , Thomas Petazzoni , Gerald Loacker , Bryan O'Donoghue , Markus Elfring , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Kever Yang , Nicolas Dufresne , Sebastian Reichel , Collabora Kernel Team , Paul Kocialkowski , Alexander Shiyan , Val Packett , Rob Herring , Philipp Zabel , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Mehdi Djait , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bryan O'Donoghue References: <20240220-rk3568-vicap-v13-0-da164b4918fe@collabora.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Michael Riesch In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sakari, On 10/22/25 18:57, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Michael, > >> The driver can be readily extended to provide support for the RK3588 >> VICAP variant. In order to keep things simple, however, this extension >> shall be submitted separately. > > I can't recall whether you already did but -- can you provide a > v4l2-compliance -m report on this version, please? > At some point (maybe v7 or so?) I did provide v4l2-compliance reports, but only for the video devices. Now I gave "-m /dev/media0" a go and the tool found two issues with some of the subdevices :-/ Sorry for that, v14 coming soon. Best regards, Michael