mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	darren@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: nv: Forward hvc traps if originated from nested VM
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 18:52:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91339d4d-38d7-4512-9fda-339bb4c2a3f4@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86jz7sl25r.wl-maz@kernel.org>



On 10-04-2025 04:22 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:20:24 +0100,
> Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10-04-2025 12:49 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:07:43 +0100,
>>> Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It was discovered while trying selftest(smccc_filter) that the
>>>> hvc trap is getting forwarded to guest hypervisor even if it is
>>>> originated from itself.
>>>>
>>>> HVC traps from guest hypervisor should be handled by the host
>>>> hypervisor and traps originating from nested VM should be
>>>> forwarded. Adding check to forward only if the hvc is trapped
>>>> from the nested VM.
>>>
>>> I disagree. HVC from EL2 must be routed to the same EL2. HVC from EL1
>>> must be routed to the EL2 controlling EL1.
>>
>> Thanks, Understood, In NV case, hvc has to be forwarded to L1
>> irrespective of it origin (L1 or L2). Need to add hvc handler in the
>> smccc_filter.c for the vm (when run as L1), so that it is handled and
>> returns with required args set.
> 
> Why? This test checks under which conditions an HVC/SMC gets routed to
> userspace. What does it even mean to test HVC if it doesn't make it
> outside of the guest itself?

smccc_filter.c has 2 tests (test_filter_denied and 
test_filter_fwd_to_user), which runs the vm(guest_code).

I was trying to modify test_filter_denied to run in vEL2, which led to 
this patch/discussion. I agree, it does not makes sense to run this test 
for vEL2.

test_filter_fwd_to_user is not feasible to run in vEL2.
Thanks for the feedback.

BTW, I could add hvc handler and run test_filter_denied in vEL2.

-- 
Thanks,
Ganapat/GK


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10  7:07 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2025-04-10  7:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-04-10 10:20   ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2025-04-10 10:52     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-04-10 13:22       ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni [this message]
2025-04-10 17:31         ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91339d4d-38d7-4512-9fda-339bb4c2a3f4@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --to=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®